Last month’s article by Toronto Star reporter Noor Javed on the prevalence of polygamy among Muslims in Greater Toronto prompted a deluge of criticism and outrage, says the Star’s Public Editor Kathy English. After careful investigation, Ms English judges the newspaper’s reporting “accurate, fair and balanced” and praises the personal courage of Ms Javed, who is herself a Muslim.
Some especially disturbing criticisms descended to personal invective.
One "open letter" that came to my office, the Star's letters page, and is now circulating in the online blogosphere, accuses Javed of demonizing Islam itself. "If your intention was to spark debate on polygamy in the community then the Toronto Star was not the forum for it," the letter states. "There is already ample anti-Islamic sentiment in the world and it is not befitting for a Muslim to add to it.
"As a Muslim woman, you had an Islamic obligation, to defend this aspect of your faith, not to deliver a further blow to an already bruised community."
No criticism of Islam allowed.
Aly Hindy, the iman of Saluhuddin Islamic Centre who openly told Javed that he has "blessed" numerous polygamous unions, now accuses the Star of bias against the Muslim community. In an email to several hundred people, now posted online, Hindy's son, Ibrahim, states that the Star has an "agenda" to "caricature" the Muslim community and Hindy as "backwards, as anti-women and even anarchist …"Last week, Hindy submitted a lengthy opinion article suggesting that Javed had quoted him out of context and was inaccurate in her reporting. In fully investigating this, including listening to Javed's tape-recorded interviews with Hindy, I found these charges to be without merit. The Star declined to publish Hindy's article. We did tell him that the Star would publish a letter to the editor to clarify his perspective. He has thus far declined to submit a letter.
Maclean’s was hauled before several “human rights” commissions for refusing to publish an article by Muslims who didn’t like the Mark Steyn article. The Star should prepare itself for the same.
h/t: Jihad Watch









Posts

[...] IS THE TORSTAR being set up for “human rights” complaint? …. [...]
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-CY! Sumtin is smellin funky in da kitchen, Loooo-cy! You got sum ’splainin’ to do!
Now, my personal sentiment is that The Toronto Star is an assault on the environment – all that paper and so very little relevant content makes it an assault on our forests. Nonetheless, I completely support The Toronto Star’s right to publish topical investigative pieces now and then.
Of course, this being Canada, publishing topical investigative journalism is fraught with pitfalls and risks.
I suggest that , given its recent (last 15 years) history, The Toronto Star sincerely regrets its lapse into relevance and is merely implementing a damage containment strategy.
After things settle down, The Toronto Star will lapse back “normal” and recommit itself to complete irrelevance. Trust me. The “Liberal voice” must continue to drone on and on and on…
In this, The Toronto Star is the mainstream media’s answer to the CBC.
Memo to HRCs: Supreme Court upholds “right to express outrageous opinion”…
The Supreme Court of Canada today issued an important ruling in a libel lawsuit that appears to have direct implications for the conduct of "human rights" commissions in this country. On behalf of a unanimous court, Justice Ian Binnie w…
CHRC hires the morally handicapped…
The Canadian “Human Rights” Commission has finally deigned to issue a decision in the complaint against Catholic Insight and its editor, Father Alphonse de Valk, for publishing Catholic moral teaching. Mirabile dictu, there will be no…