John Gray, writing in today’s Globe and Mail, presents an in-depth and, on the whole, favourable portrait of the flamboyant (some would say loud-mouthed) premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, Danny Williams. Newfoundlanders love their in-your-face premier, who has made a career of feuding with the federal government.
Newfoundland has struggled economically ever since joining Canada in 1949. Quebec screwed the province out of billions of dollars from the Churchill Falls power project. The province’s hopes have been pinned on offshore oil for over 40 years, and now the oil—and the money—have finally started to flow. But Premier Williams still isn’t satisfied because the federal government’s share of oil revenues is four times that of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The success of the bet on offshore oil is clear enough, but for more than 20 years, Ottawa and St. John's have been at odds over how the revenue should be divided and taxed. Above all, how does oil fit in to the calculation of equalization—the federal program to ensure that all provinces can provide more or less the same level of public services?
. . .
Williams publicly mocked [Prime Minister Stephen] Harper as a man who breaks his promise, a petty man who cannot be trusted, a buddy of the oil companies, a man who "just keeps on changing his colours in order to suit whatever the political need is at the time." Perhaps worst of all, Williams sneeringly referred to Harper as Steve. This is not, first of all, a familarity that Harper encourages. More important, Steve was the name that the maladroit U.S. President George W. Bush once used when the two leaders met in Washington. For Williams, that was a perfect set-up.
Newfoundlanders apparently enjoy watching their premier chew the scenery on the national stage. They gave him 70% of the popular vote in last October’s provincial election.
A rather different take is offered by Edward G. Hollett, who lives and works in St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador.
Equalization is a top-up scheme. Provincial governments that don't collect enough revenues from their sources to meet a national average get a transfer from the federal government. The money doesn't come from other provincial governments. It comes from federal revenues, from things like personal and corporate incomes taxes. That's your pocket and mine, whether you live in Petawawa or Pasadena.
. . .
[Danny Williams is] basically arguing that every taxpayer everywhere in Canada should funnel cash into the local provincial bank account based not merely on a political promise but because this province deserves it somehow. Spending more money per person than seven other provinces, Newfoundland and Labrador wants more still. And that's despite reaping huge windfalls from high oil and ore prices.The debt, you say? Well, those same taxpayers from St. John's to Victoria can also see the same provincial government doing nothing of consequence about its own debt burden. There may be something coming in the next budget but they likely heard loudly and clearly the recent admission by finance minister Tom Marshall that they'd done very little – some might say nothing – to reduce the provincial debt load despite running surpluses and still boosting public spending over the past couple of years well beyond the rate of inflation.
I’ve always wondered why Danny Williams feels morally entitled to vast quantities of taxpayer dollars when, thanks to lucrative oil resources, his province is now earning more than the national average. The equalisation programme may have originally been intended to aid have-not provinces but, clearly, it is now just another trough for powerful pigs politicians.
Here’s what Premier Williams looked like in today’s Halifax Chronicle Herald.
Background: Mr Williams has admitted talking on his cellphone while driving, an offence under Newfoundland law.









Posts

Hummm, there’s just something about Williams I don’t trust… something “Stat” like about his countenance, his demeanour, the way he combs his hair
What’s more, he wears an expensive suit and doesn’t have a beard.
I am reading your short commentary on Danny Williams and it seems totally biased. Your usage in brackets “some would say loud-mouth” and the derogatory “pigs” is totally uncalled for and shows your lack of objectivity as a writer. Quoting Ed Hollett, the most biased and one-sided blogger this side of the Atlantic, doesn’t do your commentary any justice. When you give your arguments, you should at least back them up with facts, details, and statistics. Haven’t you ever heard of giving opposing views to arguments? And then shouldn’t the reader decide for themselves what they want to believe.
Who do you think Danny Williams is fighting for? It is certainly not for Quebec, British Colombia or the Yukon! Danny represents Newfoundland, and he should do everything possible to help it economically, socially, and culturally. Because Danny Williams says no to the federal government or to ‘Big Oil’, that doesn’t mean he’s a loud-mouth.
The whole issue of equalization is another misconception in Canada. You think that Ontario or Alberta doesn’t get Federal money? There are billions of dollars funneled into those provinces(excluding the social and health transfers) under an array of federal programs that would make you roll your eyes! Instead of economic development programs going into lesser provinces, the Feds give a minuscule amount of equalization money and then expect the provinces to get on their knees and be thankful!
I get tired of all the negativity thrown at Newfoundland, especially from people who have never been there and do not know the history. Maybe Danny Williams could do a better job at diplomacy, but diplomacy will not get you anything in this federation.
But would a beard on Stat Premier (aka The Beast from the East) play down or augment the flamboyancy you speak off?
Michael Hinks,
The 98.5% of Canadians who do not live in Newfoundland and Labrador are getting tired of Danny Williams’s whingeing. (Even his neighbours are sick of it, as evidenced by the editorial cartoon from a Halifax newspaper.) Canadian taxpayers have poured billions of dollars into poverty-stricken NL. Now that NL has oil money and is not poverty-stricken anymore (compared to the Canadian average), however, Williams wants more still. Is NL a bottomless pit for taxpayer dollars?
Canadians were and are willing to subsidise provinces and territories that need it. But we are not willing to subsidise jurisdictions that no longer need it.
Given that your IP address originates in Queensland, Australia, I have to ask: why do you care about arcane fiscal squabbles between Newfoundland and the Canadian government?
Remember John Crosby? Now there was a colourful voice for Nfld and all Canadians. Really. But I’m also wondering why we don’t hear of likes of _______ was bought out / funded / caved in to / bullied by “Big” Enviros, or “Big” Greens or “Big” Climate Change Protocols, etc.? Because it does happen! Must be media discrimination…
Danny Williams preaches trickle-down economics…
What is happening to politics in this country? The Liberal Party of Canada has apparently tossed aside the rights and freedoms that gave the party its name, and now the Liberal premier of Newfoundland and Labrador tells poor constituents to be pa…