Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

November 18th, 2007 at 5:20 pm

Child abuse: Dark underbelly of cohabitation

Family scholars and caseworkers are worried by the trend toward single parenthood and cohabitation because children living with non-biological parents or a parent and unmarried partner are at far greater risk of abuse than children living with two biological parents.

"This is the dark underbelly of cohabitation," said Brad Wilcox, a sociology professor at the University of Virginia. "Cohabitation has become quite common, and most people think, 'What's the harm?' The harm is we're increasing a pattern of relationships that's not good for children."

Official child-abuse data can be sketchy because they do not always record the relationship between the victim and perpetrator.  Many academic and professional studies, however, provide necessary background.

_Children living in households with unrelated adults are nearly 50 times as likely to die of inflicted injuries as children living with two biological parents, according to a study of Missouri abuse reports published in the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2005.

_Children living in stepfamilies or with single parents are at higher risk of physical or sexual assault than children living with two biological or adoptive parents, according to several studies co-authored by David Finkelhor, director of the University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center.

_Girls whose parents divorce are at significantly higher risk of sexual assault, whether they live with their mother or their father, according to research by Robin Wilson, a family law professor at Washington and Lee University.

Society has lost—or given up—the capacity to judge anyone's choice to divorce and/or cohabit with an unmarried partner.  Personal autonomy reigns supreme.  As cohabitation continues to increase, more and more children will bear the brunt.

h/t: Family Scholars Blog

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
November 18th, 2007 at 4:02 pm

Staples sued for copyright infringement

The office supplies and technology chain Staples is being sued by Access Copyright for selling copy services copyright infringement.  The lawsuit is the largest of its kind in Canadian history.

Access Copyright, which represents almost 9,000 Canadian writers and publishers, is suing retailer Staples/The Business Depot for copyright infringement, claiming $10 million in damages over unauthorized photocopying by store customers.
. . .
"Staples/Business Depot is a sizable, for-profit organization that has built part of its business through a lucrative service that exploits the published works of authors, photographers and publishers," Access Copyright said in a release.

The news story does not mention any specific instances of copyright infringement by Staples customers, so Access Copyright could be just blowing smoke.

Michael Geist of the University of Ottawa thinks that Access Copyright has an uphill fight, based on Canadian case law.

The last time the court [Supreme Court of Canada] addressed the question of photocopying and copyright, the publishers lost badly, with the court ruling that libraries are entitled to presume that their facilities are being used lawfully.  Moreover, the Court ruled that fair dealing is a user right that should not be unduly constrained.

Access Copyright has apparently adopted the scurrilous tactics of the music industry.  They assume they’re being ripped off but can’t identify the crooks.  So, they go after innocent bystanders.

I own an HP personal scanner, and I’ve occasionally used my digital camera to photograph text and art.  If Staples loses this case, does that mean Access Copyright can come after me?

Previous related post: In Canada, only suckers pay for MP3 downloads

Print This Post Print This Post
November 18th, 2007 at 2:01 pm

John Piper: “Don’t Waste Your Retirement”

Pay attention, aging baby boomers (especially me).  Listen to The Rev John Piper’s wise and challenging words from two videos discussing ideas based on his book Don’t Waste Your Life. The book now has a website complete with blog.

Part 1:

Part 2:

“The way America [and Canada, too---ed.] conceives of post-65 life is probably not biblical.  There’s nothing in the Bible about retirement.  Not that you have to keep doing what you’re doing after 65 but, if you’re healthy from 65 to 85, dream another dream.”

h/t: Prydain

Print This Post Print This Post
November 18th, 2007 at 6:00 am

The Twenty-Fourth Sunday After Trinity

The collect for today, the 24th Sunday after Trinity, from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer:

O Lord, we beseech thee, absolve thy people from their offences; that through thy bountiful goodness we may all be delivered from the bands of those sins, which by our frailty we have committed: Grant this, O heavenly Father, for Jesus Christ's sake, our blessed Lord and Saviour. Amen.

The Epistle: Colossians 1:3-12
The Gospel: St Matthew 9:18-26

Print This Post Print This Post
|