Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

October 18th, 2007 at 6:39 pm

Nurses at San Juan hospital refuse to assist with abortions

Over 50 nurses at Hospital Universitario, San Juan, Puerto Rico, have announced that they will no longer assist with abortion procedures.  The hospital has in recent years allowed an increasing number of elective abortions, even though the publicly funded hospital is under no obligation to do so.  Nurses object to the procedures and they object to being lied to about them.

The spokeswoman for the nurses pointed out that nonetheless the number of abortions at the publicly funded Hospital Universitario has increased and that an estimated one hundred babies have been killed there in the last two years.

“Two or three years ago there were very few cases. We were told that the patient had already initiated an abortion before arriving at the hospital. Later we discovered that was not the case and that they were being admitted to have an abortion,” she said.
. . .
The nurse spokesman said many abortions are performed because of “health reasons” or because of rape or incest. “Sometimes we talk to these women and they tell us that in reality they were not raped, but rather they had problems with the child’s father and could not have the baby now,” she said.

The report says that most of the doctors also disagree with the hospital’s abortion policies.  The administration is so determined to allow killing of pre-born babies, however, that it intends to hire doctors and nurses with fewer moral scruples.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
October 18th, 2007 at 5:56 pm

Primate sees no problem with Ottawa Synod resolution

The Most Rev Fred HiltzArchbishop Fred Hiltz (at right), primate of the Anglican Church of Canada, tells Anglican Journal what he thinks of Ottawa Synod’s vote in favour of same-sex blessings (SSBs): The procedure was just fine.  Apparently he has no opinion on the content of the motion, for none is reported.

“I believe due process was followed with respect to the handling of this resolution. The outcome of the resolution is a reflection of the mind of the church local in this matter,” Archbishop Hiltz told the Anglican Journal.

As long as the correct process is followed, the outcome must be true and righteous.  Our new primate is a libertarian.  I had no idea.

Is “due process” now the cardinal virtue of the Anglican Church of Canada?  Whatever happened to fidelity to our Lord’s teachings and the Word of God?

And, once again, there’s the ambiguity created when General Synod passed Resolution A186 declaring SSBs do not conflict with “core doctrine” right before it rejected Resolution A187 that would have allowed SSBs anywhere in the Anglican Church of Canada (if the diocesan bishop approved).

Some bishops have stated that the defeat of the motion affirming the authority of dioceses to offer same-sex blessings bars dioceses from going forward on the matter. Some canon law experts opined, however, that there is nothing in the church’s canons or constitution that prevents a diocese from acting on the matter now that General Synod has said that the blessing of same-sex unions are “not in conflict” with core church doctrine.

Are we to assume that lawyers rank higher than bishops in today’s Anglican world?

Robin MacKay, chancellor (legal advisor) of the diocese of Ottawa, said the motion approved by diocesan synod was legal. He said that although General Synod did not approve the motion affirming the authority of dioceses to offer same-sex blessings, “it doesn’t affirm the opposite.” The motion, he added, “doesn’t deny the jurisdiction of bishops to (allow) same-sex blessings; it’s just that General Synod failed to act in that area.”

I’m not a lawyer and I admit I’m not interpreting A186 and A187 legalistically, but General Synod was clearly offered the opportunity to “affirm the authority and jurisdiction of any diocesan synod” to permit SSBs and turned it down.  Sounds like a rejection of SSBs to me.

Mr MacKay’s claim that rejection of a motion authorising SSBs is not tantamount to affirmation of a motion rejecting them seems to me a textbook example of the old “letter versus spirit” thing.  But, like I said, I’m not a lawyer.

2007 Anglican Blog Award winner Christopher Johnson demonstrates the vacuousness of Abp Hiltz’s comment.

The photo of our primate is one of several spiffy new official photographs posted at the ACC’s web site.  Credit: Michael Hudson for General Synod Communications.

c/p: Anglican Essentials Canada Blog 

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
October 18th, 2007 at 6:00 am

Saint Luke the Evangelist

Saint LukeThe collect for today, the Feast of Saint Luke the Evangelist, from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer:

Almighty God, who calledst Luke the Physician, whose praise is in the Gospel, to be an Evangelist, and Physician of the soul; May it please thee, that, by the wholesome medicines of the doctrine delivered by him, all the diseases of our souls may be healed; through the merits of thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

The Epistle: 2 Timothy 4:5-15
The Gospel: St Luke 10:1-7a

More on St Luke here.

Print This Post Print This Post
|