Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

August 12th, 2007 at 8:59 pm

Blog enhancements

Two snazzy new features have been added:

  1. Comments now have a “preview” button, so you can read your comment and make changes before submitting it.
  2. Individual posts, complete with link information, can be printed in a concise, reader-friendly format.  Just click on “Print This Post” beside the teeny printer icon near the bottom of each post.

I hope they prove useful.

I’ve spent some time during the past week working on enhancements and improvements after my tech expert upgraded my software to WordPress 2.2.something and moved the blog to another server at a secure undisclosed location somewhere in central Canada.

Immediately after the upgrade, the sidebars weren’t displaying properly.  After tearing my hair out in-depth investigation, I discovered that the author of my blog's theme has not revised it for WordPress 2.2.  Panic ensued.  Then I found a fix written by a very helpful WordPress expert, which I placed in the appropriate theme file.   I’m still not entirely happy with the look of the blogroll, but at least it’s visible and readable.

That was a little disconcerting, so I’ve been thinking about a new theme.  (It remains to be seen if anything will come of that.)

If anyone has any comments about layout or formatting or related issues, please let me know.

Print This Post Print This Post
August 12th, 2007 at 8:26 pm

No evidence that homosexuality genetically determined

The belief that homosexuals are born that way has strongly influenced the acceptance of same-sex behaviours in Western societies, including Christian churches.  A review of relevant studies, however, shows that there is no generally accepted scientific evidence supporting that belief.

Research in the early 1990s purporting to find biological correlates for same-sex attraction has been discredited.  Despite repeated attempts, none of those studies has been replicated.  As other researchers have shown, those early analyses were plagued by design flaws, self-selected samples, and other problems with statistical and scientific methodologies.

Dr Douglas Abbott, Professor of Child, Youth, and Family Studies at University of Nebraska-Lincoln argues that it is extremely unlikely that a gene, or set of genes, that causes same-sex attraction will ever be identified.

Genes are complex strands of DNA that through the processes of transcription and translation, direct the synthesis of amino acids into larger proteins that influence cell structure and functioning. Complex social activities such as sexual behavior cannot be directly traced to the activity of a single gene.

Many uninformed people take a simplistic view of behavioral genetics: they believe that one gene controls and determines a specific behavior. This is true for a very few, abnormal physical conditions including Huntington's disease, cystic fibrosis, PKU, and achondroplasia (Dwarfism). This fact has led some to believe that there is an alcoholic gene, a manic-depression gene, or a gay gene. However, "Genes do not act as master puppeteers within us. They are chemical structures that control the production of proteins; thereby indirectly affecting behavior…Genes do not determine one's destiny". "It is an oversimplification to say that any gene is 'the gene for a trait'. Each gene simply specifies one of the proteins involved in the process [of gene-environmental interaction], notes Hubbard.

Complex psycho-social behaviors such as sexual preference are not determined by a single gene, but by a gene-environmental process involving possibly hundreds of genes acting through complex environmental factors. [p. 5 of pdf document, references omitted]

Dr Abbott’s well-documented review bears on issues discussed in The Episcopal Church’s 2005 theological statement To Set Our Hope on Christ, which said,

Altogether, contemporary studies indicate that same-sex affection has a genetic-biological basis which is shaped in interaction with psycho-social and cultural-historical factors. Sexual orientation remains relatively fixed and generally not subject to change. [p. 25 of pdf document]

According to Dr Jacqueline Jenkins Keenan, that statement relied entirely on pre-1995 studies that have been controverted and superseded by later research.  Dr Keenan refers to several more recent analyses that found a substantial degree of mutability over time in sexual orientation among people who professed to be homosexual at a young age.  These studies also discovered considerable differences in behaviour between homosexual men and lesbians.

In short, the 2005 statement was not supported by scientific studies publicly available at the time it was written.

[A]ll of this new information should have been considered before writing a theological paper based on a scientific understanding of how homosexuality functions in our society. By making a liturgical change before stating a theology, the opportunity for reasoned dialogue was lost. … My hope has been that if people could see how unclear our understanding of homosexuality really is, they would not pull the church off of its historic foundations in the Anglican Communion.

But the Episcopal Church that claims to hear all voices does not want to hear a voice like mine. The conservatives will not talk to the liberals about what worries them as I have, and the liberals have made up their mind, so all new information is suspect.

Dr Keenan sent her research to Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and all Episcopal Church bishops.  One hopes the current state of scientific knowledge concerning same-sex attraction will figure in the planned September meeting between Dr Williams and the Episcopal House of Bishops.

h/t for Abbott paper: LifeSite
h/t for Keenan paper: TitusOneNine

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
August 12th, 2007 at 5:51 pm

Greenies split over “animal” tests on fleas

Vegan extremists (how’s that for a redundant term?) have denounced Ecover, the world’s largest producer of environmentally friendly detergents and cleaning supplies, after it emerged that the company tests some of its products on water fleas.  The Vegan Society insists the minuscule creatures qualify as animals; Ecover respectfully disagrees.

Products by Ecover, which the company says are not tested on animals, carry the prized Vegan Society mark.
. . .
But the Vegan Society is to refuse permission for its trademark to be used when the endorsement comes up for renewal later this month.

The move follows a tip-off that Ecover uses the water fleas - between 0.2mm and 5mm long - to test the effects of detergents on aquatic life.

Oooh–“a tip-off”.  Has a competitor managed to place a mole (vegan mole, of course) inside Ecover’s testing laboratories?

The water flea is not included in the EU’s animal-testing regulations.

The Vegan Society also disagrees with Ecover’s practice of taking blood from rabbits for tests, maintaining that blood should be collected from human volunteers.

Previous related post: Plants can distinguish strangers from next of kin

Print This Post Print This Post
August 12th, 2007 at 6:00 am

The Tenth Sunday After Trinity

The Collect for today, the 10th Sunday After Trinity, from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer:

Let thy merciful ears, O Lord, be open to the prayers of thy humble servants; and that they may obtain their petitions make them to ask such things as shall please thee; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

The Epistle: 1 Corinthians 12:1-11
The Gospel: St Luke 19:41-47a

Click for larger viewArtwork: Jacopo Bassano, The Purification of the Temple, c. 1580, Oil on canvas, National Gallery, London.

Print This Post Print This Post
|