Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

July 30th, 2007 at 5:47 pm

Nigerian bishop: Be born again, like Zacchaeus

Here’s another Nigerian Anglican bishop who isn't afraid to preach the necessity of repentance and conversion to his parishioners.  Is that why the Church of Nigeria is growing like crazy?

Christians have been charged to take the biblical injunction of being born-again seriously so as to receive the blessing and saving grace of God in life.

The Bishop of the Diocese of Ikwerre, Rt Rev Blessing Enyindah, who gave the  charge in a sermon during his Episcopal visit to St James Anglican Church, Elele,  for the confirmation and admission of Mothers Union and Women Guild, decried the attitude of church members still living in sin and appealed to them to live a new life.

Bishop Enyindah, in his sermon with the theme, "Salvation has come to our land," drew the biblical encounter of Zacheaus, the tax collector with Jesus Christ at Jerusalem, saying that God is prepared to forgive those who repent and confess their sins like Zacheaus.

The story of Zacchaeus is also the inspiration for the ministry of The Zacchaeus Fellowship, the group of men and women struggling with same-sex attraction who joined together as a witness to Christ's transforming power to enable his people to live in accordance with God's will.

Bishop Enyindah was elected less than four months ago as bishop for the newly created Diocese of Ikwerre in Rivers state, Nigeria.

h/t: TitusOneNine

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
July 30th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

Muslims sound alarm over new air pollutant

This sounds far worse than greenhouse gas emissions.

Muslims protest over pet food factory that could 'rain down' pork

A group of Muslims have opposed plans for a pet food factory to be built as possible pork emissions will violate their religious rights.

Pork rain. Right.

Just to make this item even more absurd, the president of the local residents' association had this to say:

Association spokesperson Grant Scott said: "Several families have complained because of the smell of the pork, and also if the factory is cooking with it, pork particles and odour could rain down on them from the chimney at some point.
. . .
"If Muslims are unhappy about it, then Jews may complain for the same reason, and Hindus may complain because of their beliefs about cows being sacred animals.”

A cow that produces pork would definitely qualify as a sacred animal.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
July 30th, 2007 at 5:05 pm

Christian radio station obliged to promote other faiths

Would this happen anywhere but Canada?

In order to comply with the CRTC’s “balance” requirement, CHRI, a Christian radio station broadcasting out of Ottawa, gives 30 minutes of air-time every week to the views of other faiths. Were it not a mostly music station, it would have to devote much more time.  Station owner Bob Du Broy has applied for a licence to operate a Christian spoken-word radio station, and no one seems to know what non-Christian programming would be sufficient to provide “balance”.

Religious music needn't be offset with other faiths, but the broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, does require that spoken-word programming offer differing views. However, it is up to the applicant to propose just how this would be done.

Even the CRTC official contacted for comment doesn’t know what would be demanded—or, if he does know, he’s keeping it a secret.

Denis Carmel, the CRTC's director of public relations, said "It's unlikely that a single-faith station could be balanced (without some programming on other faiths)." Is it possible to get a licence without outside faith programming? "I'm not going to respond to that."

“I’m not going to respond to that”?  It’s possible that the CRTC is stonewalling its own broadcasting requirements, but that would appear doubtful.  What's more likely, I think, is that the Canadian broadcast commissariat authority hasn’t made up the rules yet.

Since CRTC is unwilling or unable to provide guidance, Mr Du Broy used a formula of his own invention to estimate that his proposed talk station should broadcast 71 minutes per day of non-Christian programming.

Predictably, CHRI’s listeners don’t always welcome non-Christian programmes.

Many have enjoyed CHRI's Reflections on the Torah but Their Days, five-minute segments on Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, have been less of a hit.

People who tune in to a Christian radio station aren't crazy about Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist content.  Quelle surprise!

Like I said, only in Canada.

h/t: International Christian Concern

Previous related post: Minister goes where CRTC feared to tread

Print This Post Print This Post
July 30th, 2007 at 6:00 am

The Ruskin Cross, Coniston

John Ruskin photo, 1894John Ruskin (1819-1900), one of the most prolific and influential figures of the Victorian era, made his home at Brantwood, near the town of Coniston in the Lake District, for the last decades of his life.  Ruskin was a poet, artist, conservationist, philosopher, art historian and critic, and social commentator.  He rose to public prominence as a defender of the British painter J.M.W. Turner and, shortly thereafter, as a champion of the Pre-Raphaelites when their initial works provoked sharp controversy and even derision.

Ruskin Cross, east faceThe only child of a devout evangelical mother and a successful merchant father actively interested in nature, travel, and art, Ruskin’s thought was rooted in two movements of the late eighteenth century: Romanticism and Evangelical Protestantism.

His mother raised him in her evangelical faith and taught him to memorise long portions of the Bible.  This formative experience was a life-long influence on his thought and writings but, by mid-life, his faith had waned, although he continued to espouse Christian moral teaching.

Ruskin's aesthetic views stressed the relationship between morality, art, and architecture.  Art, he believed, is concerned not only with beauty but also with truth—and thus with knowledge of good and evil.  Art and architecture reflect the moral nature and qualities of designers.

Later in his life, Ruskin focused on social criticism.  He loathed capitalism, modern technology, and the industrial system, and rejected the economic philosophy (then known as Political Economy) that justified the uprooting of traditional agrarian society.  He was a profoundly anti-modern, not to say reactionary, thinker who looked back to the Middle Ages as an ideal period.  Calling himself “a violent Tory of the old school”, he denounced liberalism, democracy, and equality as antithetical to justice and social harmony.  He upheld hierarchy, established order, and obedience to inherited authority as most conducive to protection of the weak and unfortunate.

Ruskin is buried in the yard of his parish church, St Andrew’s, his grave marked by a large carved Celtic Cross made of green slate from a local quarry.  The carved symbols represent important aspects of Ruskin’s life and work.

(Click on all photos for larger views.)

In the centre of the east face (shown at right) sits a young man writing poetry as the sun rises.  Ruskin won the Newdigate prize for poetry while a student at Oxford and his first published writings were poems.  Above the young man can be seen a winged lion, representing St Mark, patron saint of Venice, and at the top of the shaft a seven-branched candlestick.  Two of Ruskin’s influential books on art theory and history are The Stones of Venice and The Seven Lamps of Architecture.

Ruskin Cross, south faceThe south face (above) bears a vine scroll with animals and flowers in the branches.

Ruskin Cross, west face

The west side (at left) represents works of social criticism Ruskin wrote later in his life.  The bottom illustration, showing Christ on his throne with two men standing next to him, one on his left and one on his right, refers to Unto This Last, which Ruskin regarded as his most important book.

Published in 1860, Unto This Last takes its title from the King James translation of The Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard (St Matthew 20:1-16).  At the end of the day, the labourers who worked only the last hour receive a penny, the same pay given to those who worked all day.  The workers who toiled through the heat of the day grumble against the good-man of the house, but he replies: “Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny?  Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee.”

Above are carvings relating to later works.

Ruskin Cross, north faceThe north side (at right) has an interlaced pattern.

Coniston’s Ruskin Museum contains a permanent exhibition dedicated to the town’s most famous resident.  This is the text of the brief biography posted there.

One of the great figures of the nineteenth century, John Ruskin was born in the same year as Queen Victoria and died just a year before her.  Through his writings and lectures especially on art, architecture, and society, he was one of the most influential of all Victorians.  Passionately interested in geology and natural history, he was also a gifted artist.  The first Slade Professor of Fine Art at Oxford University, Ruskin established his own Drawing School (in 1871), as well as the Guild of St George (1875), an association intended to set examples in rural economy and education; both are still flourishing today.

Born in London on 8 February 1819, John was the only son of Margaret Cox and John James Ruskin, a prosperous sherry importer in the firm of Ruskin, Telford, and Domecq, and received private tuition before taking a degree at Christ Church, Oxford.

In 1843 he published his first important book Modern Painters which began as a defence of the artist J.M.W. Turner — whom Ruskin recognised as the greatest of all British painters — and continued over four more volumes as a wide-ranging study of landscape, religion, and Old Master painting.  The Seven Lamps of Architecture (1849) contained the first principles of architectural conservation, and The Stones of Venice (three volumes, 1851-3) cemented his reputation as a writer.  As well as emphasising the superiority of Venetian models, during the height of fashion for the Gothic Revival, it also celebrated the importance of craftsmanship within a well-ordered society.

Never entirely at ease in any company, Ruskin was nonetheless a dedicated teacher.  He began to give public lectures in 1853, and taught drawing at the Working Men’s College from 1854, producing a popular handbook The Elements of Drawing (1857).  In this, he emphasized that the act of looking, and understanding, was the key point in art.  He had become friendly with the Pre-Raphaelite circle in the early 1850s, defending their avant-garde work in the press, and acquiring drawings by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Elizabeth Siddal, and, later, Edward Burne-Jones.

Further ideas on social equality and reforms were presented in Unto This Last, originally a series of magazine articles.  Its publication as a book in 1860 caused a furore, as Ruskin questioned the whole basis of capitalism, concluding that “There is no wealth but life”.  This book continued to be read well into the twentieth century, having a profound impact on later radical thinkers, and persuading the young Gandhi to fight for social justice.  Other collections of essays and lectures, including Sesame and Lilies (1865) and The Crown of Wild Olive (1866), also ran into dozens of editions.

From 1870 Ruskin lectured at Oxford, resigning in 1878 because of illness (partly brought on by a suit for libel brought by the painter Whistler) but resuming his Professorship from 1883 to 1884.  Perhaps the most significant of his later publications was Fors Clavigera (1871-84), a long series of monthly pamphlets, addressed to the “workmen and labourers of Great Britain” and outlining many new ideas.  Praeterita, his autobiography, was begun in 1885 but left incomplete.

In 1871 he bought Brantwood, picturesquely sited on Coniston Water, which would remain his home.  Ruskin suffered increasingly severe bouts of depression, and succumbed to almost total mental incapacity from 1889 until his death on 20 January 1900.  Although burial in Westminster Abbey was offered, his grave is in the churchyard at Coniston.

Ruskin’s art theory and criticism contributed decisively to the Gothic Revival, and his social and economic opinions had a profound influence on the British socialist and labour movements.  Toward the end of his life, however, he realised that his socio-economic arguments were not gaining enough support to change the course of British society.  This, compounded by illness and personal unhappiness, led him to withdraw to solitude at Brantwood, where he was cared for by his cousin Joan Severn.  After 1889, he wrote nothing more than a few letters and rarely spoke.  He died of influenza in January 1900.

The Victorian Web’s Ruskin portal is located here.  Another Ruskin portal, with links to online versions of his writings, can be found here.  Quotations by John Ruskin are posted here.

Brantwood is open year round for visitors.

The photograph of John Ruskin at the top is a platinum print taken by Frederick Hollyer in 1894. 

Links to all my blog posts about British churches and Christian sites can be accessed through the box at the top of the page.

Print This Post Print This Post
|