Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

July 14th, 2007 at 2:30 pm

Most religiously free countries have Christian backgrounds

A comprehensive new study on religious liberty around the world shows that countries with Christian backgrounds generally have the highest levels of religious freedom. The study, directed by esteemed expert on religious persecution Paul Marshall, also found that officially atheist or Islamic countries tend to have the least religious freedom.

The four countries given the highest religious freedom rating of one are Hungary, Ireland, Estonia, and the United States.

On the other hand, countries run by atheist government such as communist China, Vietnam, and North Korea were ranked in the bottom two tiers (ratings of six and seven).

Officially atheist countries were joined at the bottom of the religious freedom pole by countries with Islam background such as Pakistan, Palestinian areas, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Turkmenistan.

Canada was ranked in the second-highest tier.  A few anomalies turned up, for example, the Muslim nations of Mali and Senegal both ranked in the second tier, above France, Germany, and Greece—all ranked in the third.

Nevertheless, as Dr Marshall points out, obvious patterns emerged.

"If we want to classify the 'worst states' or the most egregious persecutors," he says, "they tend to be either communist (North Korea, China), nationalist (Burma, Eritrea), or radical Islamist, such as Iran and Saudi Arabia."

Marshall adds the greater Middle East is the most religiously repressive part of the world. The region is increasingly threatened by a trend of growing fundamentalism. "Radical Islam is the fastest-growing threat to religious freedom in the world."

To add a note of surrealism, a commenter at Christian Post recommends Gregory S Paul’s thoroughly debunked study purporting to show that religious belief is detrimental to societal health.  The same commenter even more absurdly recommends the credulous article in Skeptic touting Paul’s misguided study.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
July 14th, 2007 at 11:36 am

Teenage girl sentenced to beheading in Saudi Arabia

Another illustration of the wonderfulness of Sharia law.

A four-month-old baby choked to death while being bottle-fed by an inexperienced teenage girl hired from abroad to work as a domestic helper in Saudi Arabia.  Rizana Nafeek had given no indication of animosity or malice toward the baby or its family, yet the family blamed her for the tragedy.  She was turned over to the police, who coerced her into signing a murder confession.  On 16 June, a Saudi court sentenced her to be executed by beheading.

Rizana Nafeek, a 17 year-old girl from a village affected both by civil conflict and the tsunami disaster of December, 2004, went to Saudi Arabia for employment as a domestic worker to support her family, who live in dire poverty. Within 18 days of her arrival she met with the tragic incident in which the infant choked as she was trying to bottle feed him and from that time she has been in Dawadami prison.

On June 16, she was sentenced to death by beheading by a Saudi court after a trial in which she had no legal representation. Her work assignments had been cleaning and other general domestic work but did not include nursing and infant care. However, she was given the task of bottle feeding the child all alone and when she tried to do this, the unfortunate incident took place and she did not have the experience to deal with it.

By the time the family members arrived due to her cries for help, the child was either unconscious or dead. The family blamed the tragedy on the teenager and handed her over to the police who, according to her, ill-treated her and forced her to confess that she had strangled the infant. She was made to repeat the confession at the first hearing of the trial by the police who threatened her. However, after being able to talk to an interpreter sent from the Sri Lankan embassy in Riyadh, she made a second statement to the court, narrating her version of what had really happened. The court sentenced her to death on the strength of her first confession.

The government of Sri Lanka failed to authorise funds for the expenses of an appeal.  Her fate would have been sealed but for news reports that brought international attention to her situation.  A firm of lawyers has now been hired to assist the Sri Lankan embassy in Saudi Arabia in filing the necessary legal documents.

The Asian Human Rights Commission has urged Muslim scholars throughout the world to intervene on Ms Nafeek’s behalf.  The AHRC has also set up a site where anyone may send a letter to the baby’s father urging clemency and compassion.  (Under Saudi law, victims’ families have the power of pardon.)

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
|