Decima Research recently polled Canadians for their beliefs regarding creation and evolution. Predictably, the news story garbles important distinctions.
Canadians may not be as religious as Americans, but a new poll suggests they are not prepared to rule out God's essential role in creation.
The Canadian Press-Decima Research survey suggests that 60 per cent of Canadians believe God had either a direct or indirect role in creating mankind, shattering the myth that Canadians had long ago put their faith strictly behind the scientific explanation for creation.
As I understand it, there is no “scientific explanation for creation”. Science has an explanation for the development of Earth’s life forms, namely, evolution. But there is no generally accepted scientific theory as to how life came to exist on our planet in the first place.
The poll suggests Canadians divide in essentially three groups on the issue of creation: 34 per cent of those polled said humans developed over millions of years under a process guided by God; 26 per cent said God created humans alone within the last 10,000 years or so; and 29 per cent said they believe evolution occurred with no help from God.
. . .
The belief that God had a direct or indirect role in creation was widespread among the 1,000 respondents questioned between June 21 and 24. A majority of those polled held this view in every region of the country, in rural and urban areas, and regardless of education.And there were a few surprises: Conservatives were more likely than Liberals to say that God had no part in the process, and Alberta, regarded as the birthplace of social conservatism, had one of the lowest levels of beliefs for strict creationism at 22 per cent.
The reporter does not define “strict creationism”, but it seems to refer to the view that God created humans within the past 10,000 years. I think that most Christians, myself included, know that view as “young-earth creationism”. Using the term “strict creationism” to refer to “young-earth creationism” is misleading and prejudges a range of issues in this debate.
The poll is not mentioned at Decima’s website, and a search using Google news turned up only the same Canadian Press story in several newspapers. So, we don’t know exactly what questions respondents were asked. That would be important because the ambiguities and presumptions in the news story do not inspire much confidence in the reporting of the results.
Previous related posts:









Posts
