Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

April 26th, 2007 at 9:58 pm

North Korean escapees maltreated in China

North Korea has arguably the world’s most oppressively totalitarian government.  Under dictator Kim Jong-Il, citizens are forcibly isolated from the outside world and deprived of all human rights.  Those who manage to escape across the northern frontier into China often fare little better.  If discovered, they can be returned to North Korea where they face torture, imprisonment, or even summary execution.  But even those allowed to stay are often forced into prostitution or slavery.

Four Koreans spoke to the US Congressional Human Rights Caucus earlier this week.

The stories were filled with abuse by the Chinese government and human traffickers as well as gruesome torture by North Korean prison facilities upon the refugees’ forced repatriation.

Among the witnesses was the Rev. Phillip Buck, a prominent Korean-American pastor whose 10 years of humanitarian work among North Korean refugees in China has helped about 1,000 refugees and over 100 of them escape to South Korea.

Buck, who was born in North Korea but immigrated to the United States in 1982, recalled that many North Korean women refugees were abducted and trafficked in China. He told the story of one woman who was sold to a Chinese family where five brothers were not married and she was forced to become the sex slave of all five brothers.
. . .
“China has created the most horrific human rights tragedy occurring in the world today,” declared [Suzanne] Scholte [chairman of the North Korea Freedom Coalition]. “Over 80 percent of North Korean women are being trafficked - sold as wives, sold into brothels as sex slaves, while other refugees become slave laborers and children are orphaned and abandoned.”

The caucus also heard from, among others, a humanitarian South Korean businessman who helped North Korean refugees escape from China by boat.  He was caught by Chinese authorities and imprisoned for four years.

h/t: International Christian Concern

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 26th, 2007 at 8:37 pm

Why don’t Mexicans drink Canadian beer?

Click for enlargementMexican-brewed Corona is one of the most popular beers in the world and Canada’s number one import beer, even though Mexico grows little barley.  As well, fresh water is imported from Canada and Europe because Mexican water isn’t good enough.

Canada makes a lot of good beer, certainly much better than the wishy-washy stuff that passes for brew south of the border (or so the legend goes).  Yet Canadian beers aren’t even on the radar of beer drinkers in Mexico—or most other countries. Canada spills more beer than it exports.

Why aren’t Canadian beers as internationally popular as Corona?  Business writer Andrea Mandel-Campbell has devoted her first book, Why Mexicans Don't Drink Molson, to an in-depth look at that question.

Ms Mandel-Campbell sees the failure of Canadian beer to penetrate the international market as a symptom of larger problems with Canada’s competitiveness in the global economy.  Many large Canadian corporations, she argues, are too well-protected at home to have developed the competitive skills needed to succeed abroad.

Why Mexicans Don't Drink Molson is meant to pose a question and an answer and it's also a metaphor for Canada's missed opportunities on the global market. What I am asking here is why is it that if there is one thing Canada could have given to the world, one thing that Canada potentially could have branded and really built a global company with, was beer.
. . .
I think you can draw a direct link between the case of Molson and Labatt–who are both foreign-owned now–to The Beer Store, which is a government-seeded monopoly that basically ensures these two beer companies don't have to learn how to retail or distribute their beer because they were given it, and they didn't have to package.

If you go into a Beer Store, your retail experience is a conveyer belt and rubber-gloved salesperson. And the question is: how are you going to compete abroad if that is your level of competitiveness right here in Canada? Because it is a duopoly, they have dictated how to do business. They can sell you a beer in a dirty brown bottle. They are not going to be able to go international and do that, which is why Molson failed so spectacularly when they invested in Brazil and why they are no longer Canadian-owned.

A fundamental problem is Canada’s historical tendency to protect domestic companies, which has created a culture of dependency and lack of self-confidence across broad swathes of Canadian industry.  For example, she argues that Canada’s international competitiveness would be greatly improved if our telecommunications and banking industries were not subjected to overbearing domestic regulation.

She also criticises Canada’s emphasis on placing embassies and consulates in the United States and Europe to the detriment of other regions where diplomatic representation would yield a much higher dividend to Canadian businesses.

An excerpt from the book was published in yesterday’s National Post.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 26th, 2007 at 7:05 pm

Another proud moment in Ontario public policy

Stop the flick offThe taxpayers of Ontario, through the wisdom of their provincial government, have contributed $500,000 to join an international public education campaign encouraging youth to “FLICK OFF”.  This is supposed to persuade young people to turn off lights, television sets, computers, etc., and thereby help save the planet.  Environment Minister Laurel Broten thought this a fine idea, so she signed on and paid up.  Sane minds disagree.

Opposition parties are blasting the Ontario government for supporting a campaign aimed at getting young people to cut energy use and suggestively titled "Flick Off."

Launched Wednesday by Environment Minister Laurel Broten and British billionaire Richard Branson, the tongue-in-cheek campaign alludes to a four-letter word and the logo uses a typeface that makes the capital letters "L" and "I" look like a "U."

The campaign's website uses such phrases as "Go flick yourself," and "Are we flicked?"

On the homepage, a call to action says: "We need you to FLICK OFF, and tell everyone you know to FLICK OFF. The more you do it, the cooler it gets. The planet, that is."

NDP critic Peter Kormos says the government's endorsement of the campaign will anger parents concerned about the use of foul language by their children.

The campaign also features apparel, e.g., the charming t-shirt shown above.  I have just a few questions. Did it really not occur to anyone in the environment ministry  that parents might object?  Are those t-shirts considered acceptable attire in school?  Don’t Ontario schools prohibit garments with offensive or suggestive language?

Ms Broten says it’s all fine and, anyway, it’s not really directed toward intelligent mature people adults.

Broten said she sees nothing wrong with the government's endorsement of a campaign encouraging people to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

"It's a suitable website for youth. It's a campaign directed at youth," she said.

Laurel Broten, soon to be ex-Environment Minister, one hopes“Suitable for youth”?  If she really doesn’t know why parents and opposition MLAs are hopping mad, she needs to take a quick look at the photo of her accompanying the CBC story.  Obviously, parents of young children have every reason to consider this vulgar little campaign offensive and demeaning.

MuchMusic, Canada’s poor imitation of MTV, thinks it’s swell, however.  Their press release is appropriately headlined, “MuchMusic Tells Canada To FLICK OFF”.  I’ll bet they do.

"FLICK OFF is a natural fit for MuchMusic - it's a perfect match for our young and savvy demographic and a great way to encourage youth to reduce greenhouse gas emissions," said David Kines, VP, Music & Youth Services, CHUM Television.

News flash, Mr Kines: It’s because your audience is “savvy” that they’ll dismiss it as lame, condescending, and dumb as a bag of hammers.  It’s a good thing for MuchMusic that its bottom line depends on videos by misogynistic rappers, not public education campaigns.

To make sure you get the intended message, MuchMusic’s "flick off" page features words of profundity from two “mother flickers”.  One of them is a little cheesed that his lazy friends leave everything from lights to major appliances on at home all day while they’re out working.

[I]t’s a little bit of effort that goes a long way….Honestly how hard is it to turn off the television or a light? These are the same people complaining when there is a power outage in the summer…go figure.

Right!  Power outages during sweltering summer heat waves will be prevented if a few lazy young men turn off lights that are not in use.  “Go figure” indeed.

And then there’s the “flick off” website.  It’s a real gem.  The top of the home page features a digital clock counting the seconds (!) until time runs out in less than ten years.

"We have at most ten years—not ten years to decide upon action, but ten years to alter fundamentally the trajectory of global greenhouse emissions.” Jim Hansen, NASA.
 
Yikes. Time is running out. If we don’t curb greenhouse gases that cause global warming in a hurry, global warming is going to be a runaway train. Rising sea levels, floods, droughts, species extinction, tropical diseases—they’re going to become increasingly disastrous, and we won’t be able to stop them. Hundreds of millions of people are going to lose their homes.

Compare that overheated rhetoric with this message elsewhere at the site.

[L]ast week John Baird resorted to financial fear mongering to defend Canada's lack of action on meeting its obligations. In essence, Baird says it's either the economy or Kyoto.

“Fear mongering”?  Fie on anyone who resorts to such a nasty and underhanded tactic.

The claim that teenagers and young people will find this idiotic campaign “edgy” or clever and therefore appealing shows how out of touch Ontario civil service mandarins are.

All in all, “flick off” looks like a worthy successor to the wildly successful “one tonne challenge”.

h/t: Glenn Penner at Persecuted Church Weblog

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 26th, 2007 at 4:29 pm

US Catholic bishops support Zimbabwean counterparts

In sharp contrast to the embarrassed reaction of foreign Anglicans to the statement by African Anglican bishops on the deteriorating situation in Zimbabwe, the pastoral letter issued by Zimbabwe's Catholic Bishops Conference has quickly garnered the approval of Catholics in many parts of the world.  The Anglican letter broadly supported the position of dictatorial President Robert Mugabe, while the Catholics denounced Mugabe’s oppressive regime and called for him to repent or leave.

Today the US Conference of Catholic Bishops sent their word of encouragement and pledge of prayerful support to the suffering people of Zimbabwe.

The call already has support from Pope Benedict XVI, the bishops of Britain, the Symposium of Episcopal Conference of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM) and the Southern Africa Catholic Bishops Conference.

Following is the full text of a letter by Bishop Thomas G. Wenski of Orlando, chairman of the US bishops' Committee on International Policy, addressed to Archbishop Robert Christopher Ndlovu of Harare and president of the Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops' Conference:

"At this time of great suffering and uncertainty for the people of Zimbabwe, I write to express the solidarity of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops with the Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops' Conference.

Your Conference's recent Pastoral Letter, "God Hears the Cry of the Oppressed," is a powerful testimony to the prophetic leadership of the bishops of Zimbabwe and to the tragic situation of the people in your country.

Read the whole thing.

I’m sure many Anglicans (including me) agree with the Catholics on this one.

The full text of the pastoral letter of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Zimbabwe is posted here.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 26th, 2007 at 4:25 pm

Anglicans stunned by African bishops’ statement

Anglicans in Zimbabwe, Britain, and elsewhere have been taken aback by the pastoral letter issued last week by the bishops of the Province of Central Africa.  Independent newspaper The Zimbabwean reports.

British Anglicans are almost as stunned as their counterparts in Zimbabwe that the Archbishop of Canterbury's attempts to knock sense into their heads of church leaders in Harare's much-troubled province have come to naught.

Following a meeting of the Central African Episcopal Synod during the week of 'celebrations' marking Zimbabwe's 27th anniversary of Independence, 14 Anglican bishops issued a message that was broadly supportive of the Mugabe government, sharply contrasting with an earlier call by Roman Catholic leaders for the disgraced 83-year old head of state to step down.
. . .
Prominent among the signatories was the Bishop of Harare, the Rt Revd Nolbert Kunonga who is praised by ZANU (PF) as a "model Christian" and a man who puts nation before domination by clerics from the Western world.

The Rt Rev Nicholas Baines, Bishop of Croydon, is now in Zimbabwe on a fact-finding trip and will report to Lambeth Palace on his return.  The Zimbabwean has been informed that Bp Baines intends to steer clear of Bp Kunonga.  A wise decision.

The full text of the pastoral letter is posted here.

h/t: Anglican Mainstream

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
|