Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

April 12th, 2007 at 8:39 pm

Taliban forcing farmers to plant poppies

When the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, farmers were ordered (and, if necessary, compelled) to stop growing opium poppies because the Qur’an forbids addictive and mind-altering drugs.  Now that they need money to fight the NATO-backed government, Islamic morality is out the window.

Today, officials say the militia nets tens of millions by forcing farmers to plant poppies and taxing the harvest, driving the country's skyrocketing opium production to fund the fight against what they consider an even greater evil — U.S. and NATO troops.

"Drugs are bad. The Quran is very clear about it," said Gafus Scheltem, NATO's political adviser in southern Afghanistan. But to fight the enemy, he said, "all things are allowed. They need money and the only way they can get money is from Arabs that support them in the (Persian) Gulf, or poppies."

The Taliban’s take on Afghan poppy cultivation is estimated around 20% of the farmers’ revenue.  That could total over $100 million this year.

h/t: Religion News Blog

Previous related post: Afghan children hooked on Afghan drugs

Print This Post Print This Post
April 12th, 2007 at 8:14 pm

Globe and Mail catches up with Archbishop Andrew

Humungous Anglican embarassmentThe London Daily Telegraph reported on Tuesday that Canada’s Anglican primate, Archbishop Andrew Hutchison, unloaded on Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.  ++Andrew called ++Rowan indecisive and accused him of doing too little to defuse the looming split in the Anglican Communion.  Abp Hutchison’s criticisms appear to be little more than sour grapes, however—and particularly ill-timed ones at that, since Dr Williams is visiting Canada next week.

Actions by the Diocese of New Westminster have played a leading role in bringing the Communion to the point of schism; and, if the Anglican Church of Canada passes the motions recommended by Council of General Synod, it could well get the bum’s rush be shown the door at the next primates’ meeting.

The story finally hits the Globe and Mail today, with the bonus of additional spin. 

On the eve of his first Canadian visit as spiritual leader of the world's 77 million Anglicans, the Archbishop of Canterbury has been rapped by Canada's Anglican primate for at times lacking clear and decisive leadership as the global church slides toward fracture over homosexuality.

The primate, Archbishop Andrew Hutchison, also expressed "great disappointment" that the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams, has avoided meeting with leaders of Anglicanism's U.S. branch, the Episcopal Church, which has been strongly censured within the world Anglican Communion.
. . .
Some of Archbishop Hutchison's comments initially appeared this week in Britain's Daily Telegraph newspaper, which characterized them as a "stinging attack" on Dr. Williams.

But Archbishop Hutchison later issued a statement saying his words had been misconstrued.

What statement is that?  It’s not posted at the ACC’s website.  Thanks a lot, ACC: Way to keep your members informed.  Whaddya bet the “statement” was a press release faxed to certain friendly reporters?

Predictably, the “statement” tries to sugarcoat the earlier criticisms.

He said Dr. Williams had had to contend with problems of unprecedented complexity and sensitivity during his tenure, and he praised the archbishop for his handling of a smouldering meeting of Anglican primates — leaders of the communion's 38 autonomous churches — in Tanzania in February.

Along the way, Michael Valpy keeps intact his impeccable record as an objective reporter of religious affairs.

[A]nti-gay primates — who are in the majority — have made clear that no church that disagrees with them belongs in the Anglican Communion.

The issue, of course, is not agreement with any human being, but with the Word of God.  Indeed, the authority and interpretation of Holy Scripture is at the root of the Anglican conflict.  As Dr Williams said recently, “The Bible is still important to most of us”.  One hopes that Mr Valpy will deal with that soon.

h/t for graphic: Binky

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 12th, 2007 at 7:22 pm

Lancet study’s field manager to visit Vancouver

Some of the most telling criticisms levelled against the Lancet study's claim that over 655,000 Iraqis have died because of the 2003 invasion revolved around gathering of data used to generate that estimate.

The study’s description of field operations indicates that the survey was administered more quickly and more smoothly than any comparable survey I’ve ever heard of.  A team of two surveyors appeared unannounced at the front doors of 1849 Iraqi households asking highly sensitive and intrusive questions about everyone who had lived there since January 2002. Interviews were successfully completed in an average of only fifteen minutes each.  We are told that interviewers found family heads at home in all but 16 households.  What’s most mind-boggling (to me, anyway) is that only 15 households refused to participate—a refusal rate of only 0.8%.

Clearly, crucial questions about field operations need to be answered before the credibility of the survey can be assessed.  Despite a chorus of international concern and criticism, however, those questions, and many others, have not been answered.  The latest word is that the authors are refusing to allow outside experts to review the data.

Next week, however, researchers and other interested parties may have a chance to ask those very questions of someone who presumably knows the answers. Dr. Riyadh Lafta, the Lancet study’s field manager, will be speaking at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, on 20 April at 7 pm.

Iraqi casualty count researcher, Riyadh Lafta, is co-author of an October 2006 Lancet article which estimated that more than 650,000 Iraqis have died as a result of the 2003 US-led invasion. Professor of medicine at Al-Mustansiriya University, College of Medicine, Dr. Lafta lives in Baghdad. For 14 years he led the Iraqi Ministry of Health's UNICEF-funded rural immunization campaign.

As Dr. Lafta has been denied permission to visit the United States, his Vancouver talk will be video-linked to the University of Washington's Kane Hall in Seattle. The lecture is sponsored by the UW School of Public Health's Iraq sister university project and SFU's Faculty of Health Sciences.

Free but seating is limited.

I hope some professors or students or reporters who have been paying attention will ask Dr Lafta why he and his co-authors refuse to allow independent scientific evaluation of their study.

The speech will take place at The Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue.  I wonder whether any actual dialogue will occur.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 12th, 2007 at 6:25 pm

Jordanian man forces daughter to have abortion, then kills her

After the abortion, she had “an operation to restore her virginity”.  Then the family locked her up at home where her father shot her six times in the head and neck.   When the police arrived, he was celebrating by shooting in the air.  All to “restore” the family’s “honour”, don’t cha know.

A prosecutor has charged a Jordanian man with murdering his daughter for “honour” after forcing her to undergo an abortion for a pregnancy out of wedlock, the Jordan Times reported on Tuesday.

The criminal prosecutor charged the 68-year-old suspect with premeditated murder after he shot dead his 26-year-old daughter on Monday “for reasons related to family honour,” the daily said.
. . .
“I have cleared the family’s name and cleansed my honour,” the official quoted the suspect as saying, the newspaper said.

The family’s religion is not specified, but the news story refers to the fact that this happened in “conservative Muslim Jordan”.  The woman is the seventh victim of “honour” killings so far this year.

h/t: International Christian Concern

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
April 12th, 2007 at 5:18 pm

Alberta dominated Canadian economic growth in 2006

Statistics Canada's year-end economic review highlights continued expansion in the face of setbacks that might have been expected to curb growth.  Economic activity steadily increased despite soaring energy prices and downturns in the US housing and automotive industries.

The driving force was Alberta.

Reviewing the year, several Canadian stories stand out. Most obvious was the dominant role of Alberta in economic growth, which increasingly affected other variables, notably population flows. But the theme that echoes throughout every section of this paper is the adaptability of Canadians faced with rapid changes in their economy. Going back several years, the economy has been hit with a number of shocks which in the past could well have triggered a slowdown or even recession. Instead, growth has been remarkably stable since 2003.

The adaptability of Canadians to fast-changing economic circumstances was seen most dramatically in migration to Alberta from other provinces, which last year reached a level never before seen in Canada.

The list of Alberta’s record setting performances for a province last year includes: fastest increase ever in retail sales (16.2%), biggest hike in building permits and in non-residential construction ($3.7 billion and $1.1 billion respectively), the lowest unemployment rate (3.4%) and largest net inter-provincial migration on record. At 66,800, the number of unemployed in Alberta was the lowest in absolute terms since 1981, despite population growth of nearly one million (or 47%) in the past quarter century. Its 4.8% increase in employment was the most of any province in nearly two decades (exceeded only by Alberta in the late 1970s and BC in 1989).

Alberta by itself accounted for the faster gain in employment and retail sales in Canada than in the US. In fact, without Alberta, growth in the rest of Canada lagged slightly behind the US on both accounts. Employment in the US rose 1.9%, while Alberta boosted the 1.6% increase in the rest of Canada to a 2.0% gain for all of Canada. Similarly, Alberta’s record retail sales lifted the rest of Canada’s 4.9% gain to 6.4% national growth, leapfrogging past the 6.1% increase in the US. [footnote omitted]

On the down side, new house prices in Edmonton and Calgary jumped by over one-third in 2006, and Calgary's office vacancy rate has dropped to near zero.  Plans have been announced to build a 59-story office tower in downtown Calgary at a cost of $1 billion.  When completed, it would become the largest building in Canada west of Toronto.

The oil sands of northern Alberta accounted for 46% of all crude oil produced in Canada last year, almost double the share of ten years before.

Alberta's blistering economy overshadowed that of BC, which in other years would be seen as outstanding.  Over the past two years, BC's employment growth matched Alberta's, and its unemployment rate has fallen to below 4%, a level previously seen only in Alberta and Saskatchewan (and now Yukon).  BC was the only province besides Alberta to see a net gain from inter-provincial migration.

Last year, metals prices rose even faster than energy prices.  Rising prices for copper, zinc, iron ore, and nickel reflect increasing industrial activity in developing countries, particularly China.  The mining industry was the only one in Canada to experience employment gains in every province.

The Statistics Canada study, published today, is featured in the online edition of the Canadian Economic Observer, available here (html) and here (pdf).

Sources:

Cross, Philip, 2007. “Year end review: westward ho!” Canadian Economic Observer, April 2007. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-010-XIB.
http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/11-010-XIB/11-010-XIB2007004.pdf
(accessed 12 April 2007).

Statistics Canada, 2007.  “Study: Year end review of the economy.” The Daily, 12 April. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-XIE.
http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/070412/d070412a.htm
(accessed 12 April 2007).

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
|