Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

March 26th, 2007 at 5:51 pm

One-third of Palestinians cannot afford to eat properly

A report by international food agencies says that over one-third of Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza are food insecure.

About 34 percent of Palestinians cannot afford a balanced meal and another 12 percent are at risk of reaching this state, the organisations found in a Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Assessment published this month. Most affected is the Gaza Strip, where 51 percent of the population suffers from food insecurity.

“The poorest families are now living a meagre existence totally reliant on assistance, with no electricity or heating and eating food prepared with water from bad sources,” according to a statement by Arnold Vercken, the WFP [World Food Programme] country director for the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt).

Palestinian authorities try to blame Israel for poverty and poor nutrition, a charge rejected by Shlomo Dror, spokesman for the Government Coordination Unit.

“Why don’t the Palestinians help themselves? They have enough money to arm themselves to the teeth so why don’t they use it for the benefit of their people?”

Those sound like darn good questions to me.

h/t: Big News Network.com - Breaking Religious News

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
March 26th, 2007 at 5:19 pm

Attack of the 50-foot candidate

Giant SégoFrench presidential candidate Ségolène Royal appears before a crowd of supporters in Marseilles.

Ségo is such a big candidate that she can look down on Margaret Thatcher. François Hollande, her paramour partner and father of her four children, told the Daily Telegraph:

"Margaret Thatcher has definitely not been a model for Ségolène. Even though she's a woman, Thatcher was known for her ruthless methods. She took many blows and this hardened her.”

"Even though she's a woman"?  As if women are never ruthless!

He seems to be saying that Ségo’s life has been a breeze, with no “blows” or other bothersome unpleasantnesses.  She sounds like a regular princess.  Maybe she’s had it too easy to govern the common people of France.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
March 26th, 2007 at 5:05 pm

Even high-quality daycare is associated with poor behaviour

A long-running study of over 1300 American children has found that putting pre-schoolers in daycare is associated with rebellious and aggressive behaviour throughout elementary school.  Subsequent behavioural problems were seen even in children who attended quality child-care centres.

Researchers say the difference in behaviour between children who attended daycare and those who did not was small, but persisted even after taking into account parental income and other socio-demographic variables.

A much-anticipated report from the largest and longest-running study of American child care has found that keeping a preschooler in a day care center for a year or more increased the likelihood that the child would become disruptive in class — and that the effect persisted through the sixth grade.

The effect was slight, and well within the normal range for healthy children, the researchers found. And as expected, parents’ guidance and their genes had by far the strongest influence on how children behaved.

But the finding held up regardless of the child’s sex or family income, and regardless of the quality of the day care center. With more than two million American preschoolers attending day care, the increased disruptiveness very likely contributes to the load on teachers who must manage large classrooms, the authors argue.

The finding has proved so controversial that at least one researcher who worked on the project has fallen out with the others.

One of them [the study's authors], who wished to remain anonymous, accused lead author Jay Belsky, the director of the Institute for the Study of Children, Families and Social Issues at Birkbeck College, University of London, of "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theatre by exaggerating the negative.

On the other hand, Sharon Landesman Ramey, director of the Georgetown University Center on Health and Education, accused the authors of attempting (without success) to minimise the correlation between daycare and hostile behaviour.

John at Verum Serum highlights this feeble sop to daycare enthusiasts.

On the positive side, they also found that time spent in high-quality day care centers was correlated with higher vocabulary scores through elementary school.

So, kids who went to "high-quality" child care facilities can talk back to teachers and bully classmates using multi-syllabic words.  Those little rotters will be very well-spoken.

For some reason, I don't think parents and school officials will find that particularly comforting.

h/t: Verum Serum

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
|