<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Egypt&#8217;s internet users targeted through Kareem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magicstatistics.com/2007/03/12/egypts-internet-users-targeted-through-kareem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magicstatistics.com/2007/03/12/egypts-internet-users-targeted-through-kareem/</link>
	<description>"I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension." -- Robertson Davies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amr Gharbeia</title>
		<link>http://magicstatistics.com/2007/03/12/egypts-internet-users-targeted-through-kareem/comment-page-1/#comment-13227</link>
		<dc:creator>Amr Gharbeia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicstatistics.com/2007/03/12/egypts-internet-users-targeted-through-kareem/#comment-13227</guid>
		<description>The law was amended in the 1990s to restrict this right only to the Public Prosecutor, since he is the only one representing public interest. The has happened after Dr Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd was separated from his wife in a similar case.

It means that the appeal court yesterday has used its own rules, and not laws in the book.

The 21 websites case has appeared in the press in 2 March, so it must have been filed before that date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law was amended in the 1990s to restrict this right only to the Public Prosecutor, since he is the only one representing public interest. The has happened after Dr Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd was separated from his wife in a similar case.</p>
<p>It means that the appeal court yesterday has used its own rules, and not laws in the book.</p>
<p>The 21 websites case has appeared in the press in 2 March, so it must have been filed before that date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
