An enumerator who worked on the 2006 Census says she was asked to fabricate names and demographic information because data collection had fallen so far behind.
Sharon Newton, an enumerator for Statistics Canada, told CBC News she was asked to make up names and birthdates in order to finish the census."At the end, they just said, 'We really don't care. As long as you can find out if there [are] three people that live in that house, put down Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse and Donald Duck on it. We don't care about a name," Newton said.
Statistics Canada is responding to Newton's allegations by launching an investigation into the data. Anil Arora, director general of the census program branch at Statistics Canada, told CBC Radio on Thursday this was the first time he heard of anyone fabricating data.
"StatsCan takes the quality of the data, the integrity of the information we collect, and the security of the information we collect very, very seriously, and obviously, when such an allegation is made, it's important for us to get to the bottom of it," Arora said.
He wants to hear from any other enumerators who were told to fake information.
Anything is possible, I suppose, but this strikes me as very unlikely. In my experience, what Mr Arora said about data collection is true: Statistics Canada takes data quality, reliability, and confidentiality extremely seriously.
Also, my understanding is that concocting data is an offence under the federal Statistics Act. Any Statistics Canada supervisor who asks for fabrication of data is liable to prosecution. So is any employee who provides such.
The CBC news story doesn’t say whether Ms Newton complied with the request to invent census data.
Previous related post: Census suds









Posts

Festering anger and unresolved disputes over France's role in the 1994 Rwandan genocide has led Rwanda to declare that it will complete its diplomatic