<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans are more charitable than Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magicstatistics.com/2006/11/29/republicans-are-more-charitable-than-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magicstatistics.com/2006/11/29/republicans-are-more-charitable-than-democrats/</link>
	<description>"I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension." -- Robertson Davies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Magic Statistics - &#8220;I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.&#8221; &#8212; Robertson Davies &#187; Why are Americans far more generous than Canadians?</title>
		<link>http://magicstatistics.com/2006/11/29/republicans-are-more-charitable-than-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-8961</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic Statistics - &#8220;I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.&#8221; &#8212; Robertson Davies &#187; Why are Americans far more generous than Canadians?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicstatistics.com/2006/11/29/republicans-are-more-charitable-than-democrats/#comment-8961</guid>
		<description>[...] So, the two reasons offered by the president of Calgary United Way have been shot down.&#160; Well, then, what might account for the greater charitable giving by Americans?&#160; Philanthropy expert Arthur Brooks, whom this blog has mentioned several times in the past month or so, has an answer.  [C]onservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, the two reasons offered by the president of Calgary United Way have been shot down.&nbsp; Well, then, what might account for the greater charitable giving by Americans?&nbsp; Philanthropy expert Arthur Brooks, whom this blog has mentioned several times in the past month or so, has an answer.  [C]onservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic Statistics - &#8220;I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.&#8221; &#8212; Robertson Davies &#187; Is Canada &#8220;a nation of cheapskates&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://magicstatistics.com/2006/11/29/republicans-are-more-charitable-than-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-8898</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic Statistics - &#8220;I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.&#8221; &#8212; Robertson Davies &#187; Is Canada &#8220;a nation of cheapskates&#8221;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicstatistics.com/2006/11/29/republicans-are-more-charitable-than-democrats/#comment-8898</guid>
		<description>[...] Is it just coincidental that relatively uncharitable Quebecers live in the jurisdiction with the most generous and highly developed welfare state in North America?&#160; Probably not, according to the controversial research of philanthropy expert Arthur Brooks, who found that small-government conservatives give more to charity than do liberals who favour higher taxes and spending.&#160; Says a colleague of Dr Brooks: &quot;When you compare the giving rates between Quebec and Alberta [where average donor rates are $500 a year, the highest in Canada], they look like two very different countries,&quot; says David Van Slyke, a professor in the department of public administration at Syracuse University&#039;s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, who studied at McGill University in the late 1980s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is it just coincidental that relatively uncharitable Quebecers live in the jurisdiction with the most generous and highly developed welfare state in North America?&nbsp; Probably not, according to the controversial research of philanthropy expert Arthur Brooks, who found that small-government conservatives give more to charity than do liberals who favour higher taxes and spending.&nbsp; Says a colleague of Dr Brooks: &quot;When you compare the giving rates between Quebec and Alberta [where average donor rates are $500 a year, the highest in Canada], they look like two very different countries,&quot; says David Van Slyke, a professor in the department of public administration at Syracuse University&#39;s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, who studied at McGill University in the late 1980s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
