Have you ever agonised over how to cut a birthday cake so that everyone is satisfied with the size and shape of his or her piece? There was a time when I did—back when I was a teenager. Later, however, came the realisation that, in the grand scheme of things, a piece of the cake isn't worth arguing about. In the rare event of a dispute, "I cut, you choose" works fine.
Some grown-ups—generally parents of young children—still struggle with this conundrum. Mathematicians with too much time on their hands have solved the problem.
Enter the "Surplus Procedure" (SP) for cake-sharing between two people, and the "Equitability Procedure" (EP) for sharing between three or more. Both involve asking guests to tell the cake-cutter how they value different parts of the cake. For example, one guest may prefer chocolate, another may prefer marzipan.
Under SP, the two parties first receive just half of the cake portion that they subjectively valued the most. Then the "surplus" left over is divided proportionally according to the value they gave it. EP works in a similar way: the guests first get an equal proportion of the part of the cake they each value the highest - a third each if they are three; a quarter each if they are four, etc - and then the remainder is again divided along the lines of subjective value.
That sounds rather convoluted. Whaddya bet it's really a make-work scheme for mathematicians?
"These procedures are new and have never been tried out in real-world applications," says [mathematician Stephen] Brams.
You don't say. For some reason, I don't think they'll ever be "tried out", except perhaps at mathematicians' conventions.
h/t: Faith-Science News









Posts
