A letter signed by 20 Church of England bishops and published in the UK Independent newspaper maintains that Britain’s possession of nuclear missiles is “profoundly anti-God”. This comes as Chancellor Gordon Brown has expressed his support for replacing the ageing Trident submarine-based nuclear missile system.
I agree with the bishops that possession of nuclear weapons, because their use would necessarily fail the test of proportionality, contravenes just-war criteria and, on that ground alone, the Trident system should therefore be scrapped. On the other hand, their claim that funds expended on maintenance of Trident could be better spent on foreign aid is, I think, misguided and lacking in economic discernment.
At the Gleneagles summit a year ago the G8 pledged to "Make Poverty History" and to end the debt burden on the world's poorest countries. The costs involved in the maintenance and replacement of Trident could be used to address pressing environmental concerns, the causes of terrorism, poverty and debt, and enable humanity and dignity to be the right of all, and would go a long way towards helping Make Poverty History.
The millions raised by Live 8 and the Gleneagles summit have done little or nothing to alleviate African poverty. Many African economic and political leaders are now turning against the very concept of foreign aid as a distraction and a diversion. For foreign aid does not address the real root causes of African poverty: government corruption, economic mismanagement, and insufficient support for development through trade.
One might also question whether throwing more taxpayers’ money around will do much to address the “causes of terrorism”, given that many terrorist leaders, including Osama bin Laden and most of the the 9/11 hijackers, came from economically privileged backgrounds.
Previous related posts:









Posts
