Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

May 30th, 2006 at 9:18 pm

Judge to police and province: Why didn’t you enforce my order?

Ontario Superior Court Justice David Marshall asks a reasonable question.

A judge is demanding the OPP and province explain why they haven't enforced his order to end a native occupation of Douglas Creek Estates and lift the barricades on nearby railway tracks where protesters burned down a bridge last month.

Justice Marshall has summoned the Ontario Provincial Police, the province’s attorney general, local aboriginals, developers, and other parties to explain why his order was flouted.

Judges typically assume their orders will be fulfilled, but this one was not and the authorities have not made a determined effort to see that it is obeyed.  If Justice Marshall doesn't find out why and ensure that it doesn’t happen again, the law could be brought into disrepute.  I would think all members of the Ontario judiciary share the same interest.

It is common for judges to hold in contempt those who refuse to obey court orders.  Will the judge find the OPP, attorney general, and/or other involved parties, in contempt?  If so, will they recognise the authority of the court?  Given that they ignored the judge’s previous order, that’s an open question.  This could get very interesting.

via Dust My Broom.

Print This Post Print This Post
May 30th, 2006 at 8:42 pm

Pedophile political party launched in Netherlands

More cultural contradictions emerge in Netherlands.  A group of Dutch pedophiles have started their own political party, demanding a fair deal for sexual predators.

Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalization of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.

The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its Web site it would be officially registered Wednesday, proclaiming: "We are going to shake The Hague awake!"

The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.

"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.

What impeccable logic!

"We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals," Van den Berg told Reuters.

Why on earth would other politicians could be so mean?  Surely not because you are criminals?

Here are more highlights from the new party’s platform.

Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves. Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.

The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalizing all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.

Hold it right there.  Free train travel?  That’s pretty radical.

via Verum Serum.

Print This Post Print This Post
May 30th, 2006 at 8:01 pm

Who’s the environmental saboteur now?

In the past two weeks, Environment Minister Rona Ambrose has come under scathing attack for deciding to forego setting new emissions reduction targets when the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012 and for standing against extending Kyoto until and unless all major polluters set emissions targets.

NDP leader Jack Layton said Canada’s position had sabotaged the international climate change conference in Bonn.  NDP environmental critic Nathan Cullen decried Canada’s self-imposed isolationism and accused the government of having a “defeatist attitude”.

After all that bloviation, it transpires that Canada’s positions garnered widespread support at the conference.

Ottawa won the unanimous support of developed countries at the conference in Bonn, Germany, for its reluctance to set new targets for the post-2012 period. It also received backing from several countries in arguing there should be no new commitments for countries like Canada until major polluters such as China and India sign up for their own targets.

Rona Ambrose, the Environment Minister, said yesterday the international support is a sign Canada is playing a leadership role on Kyoto, rather than trying to sabotage it, as critics contend.
. . .
Another Canadian stance — that new commitments be delayed unless all major polluters, including developing countries such as China and India, also set targets — received the backing of a number of other countries.

"A problem that is global in cause and effect must be dealt with by all, not by some," said the Japanese submission to the conference.

The European Union pointed out that countries that have signed up for targets account for only a third of global emissions, and called for a broader response.

So, who’s the environmental saboteur now, Mr Layton?  Who’s defeatist now, Mr Cullen?

Another nasty piece of environmentalist rhetoric was proven false.  When Ms Ambrose and Prime Minister Stephen Harper said that many other countries besides Canada would fail to meet their Kyoto targets, Mr Cullen accused the Canadian government of lying.

Wrong again.

[A] Canadian summary report on the conference suggests many developed countries will struggle to meet their emissions targets. It says 19 of the 36 countries that committed to reduce their emissions have not yet submitted reports showing demonstrable progress, indicating they are having difficulties meeting those requirements.

The Canadian government comes away from the conference with the flexibility needed to move ahead with a “made in Canada” environmental plan.

via Bourque.

In a related story today, now that the Canadian federal government has won substantial international agreement with its position on environmental issues, Stephen Harper tells provinces that insist on clinging to Kyoto, “You’re on your own”:  Provinces can pay Kyoto tab, PM says.

Previous related posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
May 30th, 2006 at 7:05 pm

Department of Bureaus, International Service

The success of Médecins sans frontières (Doctors without borders) has inspired other professions to launch international volunteer organisations making it easier for individuals with professional skills to serve in poorer countries.  So, now we have Engineers Without Borders, Reporters Without Borders, and many others.  David Martin, writing in the Globe and Mail, tells us of another worthy humanitarian venture.

Fonctionnaires sans frontières (Bureaucrats Without Borders) is an international organization dedicated to bringing bureaucracy to those without. Originating in France, the motherland of bureaucracy, FSF has hundreds of former bureaucrats who volunteer their services to bring the joys of large-scale organizations to undergoverned people throughout the world.

Did you know that some national governments have only the barest framework of a bureaucratic structure? Hard as it is to believe, some countries apparently survive without such basics as triplicate forms, minimum fee schedules or even basic organization charts.

That's where FSF comes in. The group sends relief teams anywhere in the world to deal with the severest bureaucratic crises.

Whether it's a regional government in an East Asian country that doesn't have a dog-licensing program or a local municipality in West Africa that has never heard of an action plan, FSF is there to help. Teams of veteran bureaucrats are flown in to provide almost immediate help in the form of temporary bureaus complete with meeting rooms, convenors and overhead projectors.

And PowerPoint.  Mustn't forget that.

FSF volunteers are experts at implementing bureaucratic schemes of all kinds—large and small not so large—including agricultural stabilisation funds, national identity cards, tax audits, affirmative action plans, environmental impact assessments, eminent domain/expropriation regulations, nationalising productive businesses and subsidising inefficient ones, etc.

I know what I can do after retirement to utilise my experience and expertise to change the lives of disadvantaged people in undergoverned underdeveloped countries.  If I get the paperwork underway now, I should be approved by the time I retire in a few years.

For access to the full column, click here.

Print This Post Print This Post
May 30th, 2006 at 5:29 pm

Azerbaijan denies destroying ancient Armenian cemetery, but . . .

The government refused to allow a delegation of European MPs to visit the site, precipitating an international fracas.  Nothing suspicious going on there.

Fears that Azerbaijan has systematically destroyed hundreds of 500-year-old Christian artefacts have exploded into a diplomatic row, after Euro MPs were barred from inspecting an ancient Armenian burial site.

The predominantly Muslim country's government has been accused of "flagrant vandalism" similar to the Taliban's demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan.

The claims centre on the fate of rare "khachkars", stone crosses carved with intricate floral designs, at the burial ground of Djulfa in the Nakhichevan region of Azerbaijan, an enclave separated from the rest of the country by Armenia.
. . .
The Azerbaijan government, which denies the claims, is now at the centre of a row with MEPs, some of whom it accused of a "biased and hysterical approach". Its ambassador to the EU also says the European Parliament has ignored damage to Muslim sites in Armenia. Azerbaijan has refused to allow a delegation of Euro MPs permission to visit the 1,500-year-old Djulfa cemetery during their trip to the region last month.

At one time, there were 10,000 khachkars, most dating from the 15th and 16th centuries; but by the 1970s, only 3000 were still standing.  Since then, Azerbaijan has been intentionally demolishing those that remain.  Reports appearing in the Armenian press claim that sledgehammer-wielding Azeri soldiers smashed the final khachkars last December.  Charles Tannock, Conservative foreign affairs spokesman in the European parliament, says that the area has been covered over with concrete and made into a military camp.

In mid-April, a report from the Institute for War and Peace Reporting quoted an eye-witness visitor to the cemetery site saying it had been completely destroyed.

via Dhimmi Watch.

Previous related post: Medieval Armenian cemetery destroyed

Print This Post Print This Post
May 30th, 2006 at 5:07 pm

This blog as a graph

Here is the HTML of Magic Statistics rendered as a pretty picture.

Click here for larger view
Made by Websites as Graphs, it's whole new way of looking at websites.  Here's an explanation.

via Siris

Print This Post Print This Post
|