Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

May 8th, 2006 at 6:56 pm

“Oh, no! Chavez won’t go!”

Venezulelan President Hugo Chavez appears desperate for someone to run against him in this December's election.  So desperate that, if opposition parties boycott the election, as they did last time around, he says he'll hold a referendum asking voters to approve his remaining as president until 2031—a 25-year term.

This line from the news story made me laugh out loud:

Mr. Chavez rejected allegations he was a power-hungry tyrant . . .

Yeah, right!  I just want to hold office for the next quarter-century without being bothered by irrelevant distractions like campaigning for the votes of commoners taxpayers riff-raff hoi polloi scumbags citizens.

Before Mr. Chavez took the stage, thousands of his supporters chanted: "Oh, no! Chavez won't go!"

Now there is a threat.

Previous related post: Hugo Chavez banishes imperialist horse.

Print This Post Print This Post
May 8th, 2006 at 6:22 pm

Keith Richards knows who he is

Too many of today's stars and celebrities think their notoriety gives them a platform to pontificate on their favourite causes ad nauseum.  Success as an entertainer, however, doesn't qualify someone as an expert in politics or war or the law or the environment or whatever.  This seems to me so obvious that it hardly needs to be said, but some entertainers apparently have a high opinion of their expertise in whatever fashionable cause they have signed on to.

Keith RichardsKeith Richards is not like that.  He can elicit a kind of grudging admiration because he knows who he is and just why he's so successful and well-known.  Not because people want him to speak up about world poverty, or the situation in Darfur, or the current travails of the British Labour Party or the Church of England, or alleged injustices perpetrated on deer.  He's as rich as Croesus because he has gifts for playing electric guitar and writing rock 'n' roll songs.  That's it—and he seems to know that better than anyone else.  Rex Murphy comments:

I like him, too, because he seems to be cause-phobic. No chance of Keith Richards showing up in PEI or Newfoundland some day, shading himself under the blimpish canopy of Pamela Anderson's hyperinflations, to plead the cause of the seals and chimps. No chance of him showing up wearing a Kabala trinket to "raise our consciousness" on the declining pitch of the howler monkey, or whatever happens to be the cause of the week, in a tête-à-tête with the Chairman of the Bored, Larry King.

I liked it, too, when he declined the world-wide exhibition of the superfamous and the superrich when they gave of their glamorous time to Make Poverty History. He asked the right questions and made the right remarks.

To Uncut magazine, he said: "I mean, who's this gratifying, and where are the Africans? Where was their say?" Referring to the pressure on him to participate, he said, "Oh yeah, all the Sirs had a bash, believe me."

"All the Sirs had a bash." There's a T-shirt slogan worth a million "I care" wristbands. All the Sirs, the Dorian Grays of rock geriatrics, are caricatures of themselves.

But not Keith Richards.  He's still not letting anyone tell him how white his shirts should be—and he's not trying to tell us, either.  That's refreshing.

I'm not saying he's any kind of positive moral example (although he may be a saint: he does attend church).  He's been busted for drug possession, including heroin, and he has in the past treated his wives and girlfriends abominably (although Patti, his wife of twenty years, and her parents are very happy with him and claim he's a Christian).  I'm just saying he's not a hypocrite, and he hasn't let worldly success seduce him into believing that he's an expert in anything really important.  He's an entertainer and he knows it. 

Keith had surgery today to relieve headaches that began after he fell out of a palm tree ten days ago while vacationing in Fiji.  The operation has been pronounced "a complete success".

For access to Rex Murphy's full column, click here.

Contact Music link via Nealenews.

Print This Post Print This Post
May 8th, 2006 at 5:02 pm

Turkey pressures Canada to back away from recognition of Armenian Genocide

Turkey has recalled its ambassador to Canada "for a short time" to protest moves to recognise the Armenian Genocide.

The announcement was Turkey's latest salvo against increasing international pressure on Ankara to recognize the killings of Armenians at the time of the First World War as genocide.

Armenians say 1.5 million of their people were killed as the Ottoman Empire forced them from eastern Turkey between 1915 and 1923 - and that this was a deliberate campaign of genocide by Turkey's rulers at that time.

Turkish officials insist the death count is inflated and that Armenians were killed or displaced as the Ottoman Empire tried to secure its border with Russia and stop attacks by Armenian militants.

Turkey recently criticized Prime Minister Stephen Harper for remarks he made in support of recognizing the mass killings as genocide, and warned that such statements threatened Turkish-Canadian relations.

Turkey has threatened economic reprisals against Canada, such as forbidding Canadian companies from bidding on big construction projects in Turkey.

Previous related post: Remember the Armenian Genocide.

Print This Post Print This Post
May 8th, 2006 at 4:50 pm

Computers vanquish Beatles in Apple vs Apple suit

I admit I thought this an unlikely outcome but, as I said, I'm not a lawyer.

Apple Computer Inc. is entitled to use the apple logo on its iTunes Music Store, a judge ruled Monday, rejecting a suit filed by Apple Corps Ltd., the guardian of The Beatles' commercial interests.
. . .
Judge Edward Mann ruled that Apple Computer used the fruit logo in association with the store, not the music, and thus did not breach the agreement.
. . .
"I conclude that the use of the apple logo … does not suggest a relevant connection with the creative work," Mann said in his written judgment. "I think that the use of the apple logo is a fair and reasonable use of the mark in connection with the service, which does not go further and unfairly or unreasonably suggest an additional association with the creative works themselves."

The judge ruled that Apple Computer's use of the logo is permitted under the 1991 agreement between the computer company and Apple Corps.

"The primary reason there is no breach (of the 1991 deal) is because the use of the logo is still a permitted use as described in clause 4.3 of the 1991 agreement," the judge declared this morning.

Apple Computer had defended its use of the logo in association with its music products, as being simply data transmission, which is allowed under clause 4.3 of the 1991 agreement.

Besides, it's not as if anyone who's not blind would confuse the two logos: Apple Corps' is a realistic green apple, while Apple Computer's is a stylised shiny silver-blue one with a bite taken out.  (You can take a look at them here.)

Apple Computer asked Judge Mann to order Apple Corps to pay its legal fees, which are believed to total £1.5 million for each side, but the judge has refused to rule on that pending further hearings—and more legal bills.

This is no surprise, however: Apple Corps has already announced it will appeal today's verdict.

Business Week link via Pearcey Report.

Print This Post Print This Post
|