The latest UK statistics on crimes reported to the police show that robberies, sex offences, and violence causing injury have increased. Drug offences are also up 20%.
Overall violent crime rose by one per cent in the Oct-Dec 2005 period, compared with the same period in 2004, to just under 298,000 crimes.
Within that overall total, "more serious violence" - the smallest category - fell by 12 per cent, to around 9,800.
But there was a six per cent rise in "offences against the person - with injury", to 130,700 crimes.
Violence offences without injury, which include harassment, fell slightly. Much of the lower level violence has been driven by heavy drinking. Criminal damage also rose slightly.
These data on police-reported crime are so unfavourable that the Home Office tried to deflect attention by pointing to the British Crime Survey (BCS), a general population survey focusing on crime victimisation.
The BCS is described by the Home Office as "generally accepted as the most authoritative and reliable indicator of crime trends" - an assertion which is disputed by some experts in the field.
The BCS has traditionally showed rates of crime higher than the recorded figures but the Government has highlighted it in recent years because of its apparent downward trend.
The Home Office pointed out that, measured by the BCS, the risk of being a victim of crime, at 23 per cent, was the lowest since 1981 and violent crime was "stable" year on year in the BCS.
This reminds me of the old adage, "Figures don't lie, but liars politicians will figure."
The minister responsible is Home Secretary Charles Clarke, who is already under great pressure to resign for a scandal earlier this week when it was revealed that over 1000 foreign criminals had been released "in error" from UK jails without being considered for deportation. The criminals include rapists, murderers, robbers, and paedophiles. Mr Clarke has admitted that over 900 of them are loose in the UK and may never be found because their whereabouts are unknown. Prime Minister Tony Blair rejected Mr Clarke's offer to resign, leading the Telegraph to suggest that the logic of the Blair government is "the bigger the blunder, the smaller the chance of resignation".
Public pressure for Mr Clarke's resignation has intensified since he admitted today that at least five of the foreign criminals released by mistake have since been convicted of crimes involving drugs or violence. Two more are being investigated on possible charges of sexual assault. The Times of London story includes this mind-boggling gem: "[A]lmost a third of those released were freed after the Government had already been informed about the problem." What does Mr Clarke have to do to get sacked?
A final insult: In a related story, the Times reports that one of the foreign criminals released because of "a major administrative cock-up”, a 24-year-old Jamaican previously jailed in the UK for having sex with an underage girl, has since been sentenced to 24 years for attempted murder after shooting a man outside a Sheffield nightclub.
This next link has been around for a year, but this is a fitting time for another look. Charles Clarke presents the case for national ID cards in "The very model of a modern Labour minister" (with apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan)—one of the cleverest and side-splittingest flash animations I've ever seen. Here's the first verse:
The world today is filled with villains stealing one's identity
And terrorists intent on acts of violent extremity
Our citizens are prisoners, our criminals at liberty
Our nation at the mercy of felonious proclivity
Our very own Home Secretary will rebuild our society
A model of sagaciousness and picture of propriety
It's patent that protection of the future of humanity
Relies on Mr Clarke to put an end to this insanity!
Mr Clarke seems to have given up on putting an end to the insanity of "criminals at liberty"; he's now feeding the insanity!
Previous related post: A primer on crime statistics