Magic Statistics

“I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies

February 28th, 2006 at 8:25 pm

Palestinian Christian women wearing headscarves

Since Hamas assumed power in Gaza and the West Bank, more and more Christian women are wearing headscarves in an effort to keep a low profile in mixed Christian-Muslim areas.

Palestinian educator Dr. Maria Khoury geared up for the winter chill with what was at the time a meaningless purchase: a black silk scarf with silver stripes to drape around her neck. But now, on her daily excursions from the West Bank's Taiba to nearby Ramallah, the scarf serves as a political symbol of the changing times.

"Since Hamas took over, I cover my head in Ramallah," she says. "I don't feel comfortable."

In the largely cosmopolitan Ramallah, though they comprise some 10 percent of the population, Christians are becoming less and less visible.
. . .
"I see more and more women covered up," Khoury says, explaining that for now, it's preferable to play it safe and assimilate on the street, even if she would never choose to cover her head otherwise.

"Years ago I even used to go in short sleeves," she says. "You'd have to put a gun to my head to get me to wear short sleeves now."
. . .
A small minority, estimated to be between one to two percent of the total Palestinian population, Christians have long been in an awkward position, managing a balancing act of simultaneously being insiders and outsiders.
. . .
Further exaggerating the balancing act in recent years is an insecure relationship with western Evangelical Christians, who fervently support Israel, leaving indigenous Palestinian Christians on the other side of the security fence sometimes feeling neglected or like the enemy, despite a shared reverence for the Christian Gospels.

Read the whole thing.

via Dhimmi Watch.

Dr Khoury was the subject of a post last September after her home town of Taybeh/Taiba was attacked by a mob of Muslims.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 28th, 2006 at 8:07 pm

Live free or live elsewhere

Sir Trevor Phillips, chairman of the UK Commission for Racial Equality, says that freedom of speech is a core value of the British people, and must be accepted by all who wish to live in the UK. People are allowed to say what they please, short of threats or intimidation–however absurd, however unpopular–and that includes the freedom to express views that offend others.

Sir Trevor told ITV1's Jonathan Dimbleby programme: "What some minorities have to accept is that there are certain central things we all agree about, which are about the way we treat each other. That we have an attachment to democracy, that we sort things out by voting not by violence and intimidation, that we tolerate things that we don't like."

And that commitment to freedom of expression should also allow Muslim preachers to make comments about homosexuality that are offensive to broad segments of the British population, he said.
. . .
He also rejected the idea of Shariah law in Muslim communities in the UK.

"We have one set of laws. They are decided on by one group of people, members of Parliament, and that's the end of the story. Anybody who lives here has to accept that's the way we do it. If you want to have laws decided in another way, you have to live somewhere else," he said.

Sensible words, but British Islamists will not stop agitating just because Sir Trevor says Shariah law is not on in the UK. When push comes to shove, as it will sooner or later, I hope the government backs Sir Trevor's words with actions.

via The Free West.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 27th, 2006 at 6:05 am

Bunyan Museum & Bunyan Meeting Free Church, Bedford

Bedford is an ordinary English town that has little to attract travellers not interested in John Bunyan; but for Christians, it is a major religious site. Bunyan was born in 1628 in Elstow, just south of Bedford. After a short spell in the Parliamentary army, during which he was active as a lay preacher, he returned to Elstow in 1647, married, and had four children. In 1653, he joined Pastor Gifford’s Independent Church in Bedford. By 1655 Bunyan and his family were living in St Cuthbert's Street in Bedford, and by 1659 he was recognised beyond the county border as a gifted preacher.

After the Restoration of the Monarchy in 1660, the English government sought to enforce religious uniformity by requiring everyone to conform to the Church of England and the Book of Common Prayer, and by prohibiting preaching without a licence. Yet Bunyan continued to preach. When told by a magistrate that he would be imprisoned until he agreed to conform, he famously replied, "If I am freed today, I will preach tomorrow."

He was imprisoned in Bedford County Gaol from 1660 to 1672, during which time he wrote, among other works, The Pilgrim’s Progress Part 1 and Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners. Bunyan was released in 1672 when King Charles II issued a Declaration of Religious Indulgence but was jailed again for a short time after the declaration was withdrawn in 1675. Pilgrim’s Progress was first published in 1678. Bunyan later wrote Pilgrim’s Progress Part 2 (1685) and The Holy War. He spent the rest of his life preaching mainly in the Bedford area. He died in 1688 while on a visit to London, and is buried at Bunhill Fields, London.

Pilgrim’s Progress was a well-loved and immensely influential book in England in the 18th and 19th centuries, and was even more popular in Scotland and colonial America. It is one of the most well-known books ever written and has been translated into over 2000 languages. Bunyan’s greatness was recognised by such literary giants as Jonathan Swift, Samuel Johnson, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Lord Macauley. His unforgettable imagery grew out of the classical Reformation teachings concerning man’s fallen nature, grace, justification, and the atonement. Theologically, Bunyan was a Puritan in that he held a Calvinist view of grace but was an independent in his view of the church.

It is sometimes claimed that Bunyan became a Baptist preacher but, according to a little book I bought at the Bunyan Museum, that view is mistaken. David Marshall, in An Introduction to the Life and Works of John Bunyan (Bishopsgate Press, 1989), writes:

There is no record that Bunyan was baptized by immersion (parish records in Elstow indicate that his children were christened), and it is certain that Gifford's congregation was a Union church made up of both Baptists and Independents. Hence there is no ground whatever to assert, as so many have done, that Bunyan became a Baptist preacher. In his Differences in Judgement about Water Baptism (1673) he incurred the anger of prominent Baptists by arguing that adult baptism was a non-essential.

The town of Bedford has done much to preserve and honour the memory of one of the English-speaking world’s most celebrated and influential writers. An important and inspiring museum was opened in 1998, adjacent to the Bunyan Meeting Free Church, where he served as minister from 1672 to 1688.

There are many other places in Bedford with Bunyan associations. A plaque on the house at 17 St Cuthbert’s Street marks the location of the cottage where Bunyan and his family lived from 1655. The cottage was demolished in 1838. The County Gaol where Bunyan was imprisoned from 1660 to 1672 and from 1676 to 1677 was demolished in 1801. At its former location on the corner of High Street and Silver Street, a plaque has been set in the pavement.

The photo at left shows the StatDaughter and me standing by the nine-foot bronze statue of Bunyan that stands on St Peter’s Green at the north end of High Street. It was presented to the city in 1874 by Hastings, Duke of Bedford. Around the base are three bronze panels illustrating scenes from Pilgrim’s Progress.

(As always, click on photos for larger views.)

The John Bunyan Museum is the main Bunyan site in Bedford. Its collection of exhibits, papers, and early editions of Bunyan’s books was lovingly assembled by Christian believers who raised over £1 million to create the museum through donations to the Bunyan Trust. Government aid was refused because government funds for museums and galleries derive partly from lottery revenues, which Bunyan would have considered immoral. Among the many items of interest is this pulpit from which Bunyan preached.

The Bunyan Meeting Free Church was founded as an Independent church in 1650 by a group of twelve Nonconformists. The first pastor was John Gifford, under whose ministry John Bunyan was converted to Christ in 1653. Bunyan began preaching in 1657 and, as already mentioned, had run afoul of the law by 1660. Shortly after his release in 1672, he was called to be the minister here and remained in that office until his death.

In 1672, Bunyan and a few others purchased a barn and orchard for £50 at the church’s present site on Mill Street. The barn was used as the place of worship until 1707 when the first church was built here. This was replaced by the present structure in 1850, which was expanded in 1868 and 1892. A new extension, housing the Bunyan Museum, was built in 1998.

The church today is a thriving congregation in fellowship with the Baptist Union of Great Britain, the Congregational Federation, and the United Reformed Church of England and Wales. The great bronze doors at the entrance to the church were presented by Hastings, Duke of Bedford, in 1876. The doors’ ten panels depict scenes from Pilgrim’s Progress.

The church has eight stained glass windows, installed between 1927 and 2000. Seven show scenes from Pilgrim’s Progress, while this one shows Bunyan writing at a desk in prison. The words around the outside edge are the opening words from his great book: "As I walk’d through the wilderness of this world, I lighted on a certain place, where was a Denn; And I laid me down in that place to sleep: And as I slept I dreamed a Dream". A postcard showing this window was the only mail to reach church mediator Terry Waite during his captivity in Beirut from January 1987 to November 1991. The reminder that Bunyan spent all those years in prison for his faith in Christ gave Terry Waite hope to persevere. He later spoke highly of the encouragement he received from its message during his years of solitary confinement.

This window shows Christian, his pack having been loosed from his back, kneeling at the cross. The text around the outside comes from Revelation 5:12, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing. The text across the bottom of the window says, "He hath given me rest by his sorrow and life by his death".

In closing, here is the one hymn John Bunyan is credited with writing. It first appeared in Pilgrim’s Progress Part 2. In my experience, this hymn is rarely sung in church today; in fact, I first heard it sung in a church history class at Regent College. The professor, Dr Donald Lewis, often illustrated particular classes by leading us in a hymn from the time period we’d been studying. At the end of a class on religion in 17th-century England, we sang this:

Who Would True Valour See

Who would true valour see,
Let him come hither;
One here will constant be,
Come wind, come weather
There's no discouragement
Shall make him once relent
His first avowed intent
To be a pilgrim.

Whoso beset him round
With dismal stories
Do but themselves confound;
His strength the more is.
No lion can him fright,
He'll with a giant fight,
He will have a right
To be a pilgrim.

Hobgoblin nor foul fiend
Can daunt his spirit,
He knows he at the end
Shall life inherit.
Then fancies fly away,
He'll fear not what men say,
He'll labour night and day
To be a pilgrim.

I've only heard one recorded rendition of Bunyan's hymn, but it's a good one. Maddy Prior and the Carnival Band recorded a full CD of traditional, folk-oriented arrangements of a well-chosen collection of 17th, 18th, and early 19th century English hymns. The CD is entitled Sing Lustily and with Good Courage. I recommend it.

Here is the home page of the John Bunyan Society. A map showing Bedford’s location is here.

Links to all my blog posts about British churches and Christian sites can be accessed through the box located at the top of the page.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 26th, 2006 at 12:25 pm

Reaction disproportionate to offence

The refusal of most North American media to re-print the Mohammed cartoons has left many Canadians and Americans with the idea that all of them were intended to insult Muslims and dishonour the prophet of Islam. That this is not the case would be obvious to most people who have actually seen the images. The Western media are therefore complicit in spreading the false impression that the cartoons are deliberately disrespectful.

Moreover, as Rex Murphy points out, the character and magnitude of Islamist response to the cartoons—riots, embassy burnings, church attacks, killings, etc.—far outweigh the alleged initial offence.

The reaction was not proportionate, on any scale, to the perceived offence, and if it had any signature characteristic it was one of threat and intimidation.

I am not sure we can have a dialogue based on "respect" that is threaded with the idea of violent retaliation if one side of the conversation does not have its way. The dynamic of any dialogue cannot be ceded to the extremists for that is the nullification of the idea of dialogue. "Agree with us — or else" is not a seminar topic.

Judging by the number of people who have died in the riots so far, the number of Middle Eastern journalists in jail, the number of embassies and churches burned, the fatwas issued against the cartoonists and the bounties to encourage their execution, the "or else" faction of Islam is by far the dominant one.

For free access to the whole column, click here.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 26th, 2006 at 6:37 am

Quinquagesima

The collect for today, Quinquagesima, or the Next Sunday Before Lent, from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer:

O Lord, who hast taught us that all our doings without charity are nothing worth; Send thy Holy Ghost, and pour into our hearts that most excellent gift of charity, the very bond of peace and of all virtues, without which whosoever liveth is counted dead before thee; Grant this for thine only Son Jesus Christ's sake. Amen.

The Epistle: 1 Corinthians 13:1-13
The Gospel: St Luke 18:31-43

Print This Post Print This Post
February 25th, 2006 at 7:36 pm

New UN human rights body “more contemptible than its predecessor”

The United Nations has proposed creation of a new Human Rights Council to replace its discredited predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights. The problem is that the new body will be even worse than the old.

With a design which promises an institution more contemptible than its predecessor, the process has brought the UN to the edge of an abyss.

Human rights protection was the UN's essential rationale. The credibility of the entire organization depends on fixing its discredited central human rights mechanism, the Commission on Human Rights. It is now clear that this effort has failed.
. . .
[T]he proposed Council represents an enormous step backward for the international protection of human rights and the spread of democratic governance. The United States would do the legacy of Eleanor Roosevelt, the first Chair of the Commission on Human Rights, an enormous disservice by pretending otherwise.

So, why exactly is the UN's spanking-new Human Rights Council so reprehensible? Start with the list of member states. Council members include China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe—stellar examples all of punctilious observance and protection of liberal rights and freedoms.

If you want to know what else is wrong, read the whole thing.

Previous related posts:

via little green footballs.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 25th, 2006 at 6:04 pm

How long before this shows up on CSI?

A new radiological technique for mass fatality investigation was used in the field for the first time recently by a team of researchers led by Professor Guy Rutty, a University of Leicester forensic pathologist.

Previous related post: Forensics: TV and real-life.

via Faith-Science News from The American Scientific Affiliation.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 25th, 2006 at 5:46 pm

Bush knew of threat ahead of time

Why am I not surprised?

Government documents declassified today reveal that President Bush was briefed last summer of "a substantial risk" that Vice President Dick Cheney would shoot an elderly male in the face sometime in the next several months.

Read the whole thing.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 25th, 2006 at 4:05 pm

Canadian Muslims want laws against insults

The Crown has decided not to lay charges against the Western Standard and [Calgary] Jewish Free Press after the two publications re-printed most of the Mohammed cartoons. After an investigation, the chief prosecutor for Calgary decided that the publications had not violated Canada’s existing hate laws. So, Canadian Muslim leaders say that laws must be expanded so as to prevent such insults in the future.

Syed Soharwardy, president of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, said the law must be expanded to outlaw insults against "all prophets and messengers of God, all divine books," including those of Christianity and Judaism.

"If somebody insults them, if somebody makes fun of them, they should be guilty of a hate crime and the law should be changed to reflect that," he said.

Wisely, in my opinion, the federal government refuses to take the bait.

Patrick Charette, press secretary to Justice Minister Vic Toews, told Reuters that Canada's new Conservative government has no plans to broaden the scope of the 36-year-old law.

"The provisions covering hate propaganda … as they stand strike a balance between the freedom of expression and also the rights of minorities to be protected from hatred," Charette said. "It's broad enough right now."

Muslim leaders want Christianity and Judaism protected on the same terms as Islam? Sounds like the fox wants to guard the henhouse. Mr Soharwardy’s proposal is a very bad idea, for Islam and Christianity have diametrically opposed understandings of the person and work of Jesus. Any legal regulation that met the demands of Islam would not be congenial to Christianity.

The Koran teaches that Jesus lived, but denies that he was crucified. (Sura 4:157-159.) Modern Muslim scholars reject the Christian teaching of the cross as offensive and dishonouring to Jesus. If Canada’s hate laws were to be changed in accordance with the wishes of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, it wouldn’t be long before someone professing agreement with orthodox Christianity about the death of Christ is hauled into court by a Muslim claiming to be insulted and offended.

So, thanks but no thanks, Mr Soharwardy. Christians neither need nor want you to speak up in "defence" of our Lord and Saviour. And Jesus certainly does not need laws protecting him from insults. He’s endured far worse in the past, and come out better than ever.

Previous related posts:

via Angry in the Great White North.

Print This Post Print This Post
February 25th, 2006 at 2:03 pm

Differences between men and women: verboten to discuss

One factor behind the successful putsch against Harvard University President Lawrence Summers was his scandalous statement that there are innate differences between the sexes. British biologist Peter Lawrence has also recently run afoul of the thought police of political correctness. His article, Men, Women, and Ghosts in Science, explored differences between men and women that appear to be rooted in biology and genetics. Science magazine had accepted the article for publication, but changed its mind at the last minute and handed Dr Lawrence a lame excuse.

An edited version of Dr Lawrence’s article is posted here. One of those who condemned Dr Lawrence’s paper was Massachusetts Institute of Technology biology professor Nancy Hopkins, who accused him of employing old-fashioned stereotypes. Now there’s a objection based on well-defined and accepted scientific concepts.

This is the same Nancy Hopkins who raised a ruckus over Lawrence Summers’s speech in which he suggested that innate differences between men and women could help explain why women are underrepresented in math and science.

The always hysterical Hopkins was in attendance at Summers's speech, but she had to leave early because she felt she was going to black out or be sick if she stayed. And no, it wasn't a touch of the flu, but Summers's mere words that prompted Hopkins's hissy fit.

Many women and many female sci