The Asia Times columnist known as Spengler looks at two new films, Brokeback Mountain and Munich, and thinks they illustrate why both Hollywood and the Democratic Party are not doing so well lately.
Liberal Hollywood is the heart of America's Democratic Party, and its offerings for the Christmas season explain why the opposition to the present administration remains weaker even than the flailing White House. A red-state cultural revolt won the last election for President George W Bush (It's the culture, stupid!, November 5, 2004), and Hollywood presents a view of the world that Americans find-–well, revolting. This is not an accident, but a nasty prank by the Zeitgeist.
. . .
"Bareback Mountain" portends commercial disaster. In the young-adult demographic group that sustains the American cinema, on-screen anal sex draws limited interest. Young men find it embarrassing to watch a star like Jake Gyllenhaal in this context, while young women find it disappointing. But no film of the first decade of the 21st century will flop as miserably as Spielberg's Munich, a "prayer for peace" derived from the 1972 terrorist attacks on Israeli athletes at the Olympic Games. Spielberg's theme, as he explained in the Time story, is the futility of the Israelis' subsequent retaliation.Futility makes poor theater. If Spielberg had portrayed a moral equivalence between the great white shark and its hunters, Jaws would have bombed at the box office. American audiences sat on the edge of their seats waiting for Roy Scheider to wreak vengeance against the toothsome monster. Indiana Jones' enemies meet hideous deaths, to audience cheers. The director who made his reputation pandering to vengeful bloodlust now wants moviegoers to ponder the moral equivalences in war.
Spengler includes a quote from Tony Kushner, "the world's worst playwright" whom Spielberg chose as the screenwriter for Munich:
Kushner identified with the Soviet Union until its collapse. Afterward he told an interviewer, "The collapse of the Soviet system does not mean that capitalism has succeeded … Socialism is simply the idea that people are better off if we work collectively and that the economic system we live in is made by people and therefore can be controlled intelligently rather than let loose. There's no way that can't be true."
Kushner's child-like faith in Soviet-style collectivism is so at variance with the empirical evidence as to constitute a form of cognitive dissonance. I've met social scientists with a similar view: If reality does not conform to my model, so much the worse for reality.
And in not unrelated news: Kong crashes.









Posts
