According to Editor and Publisher, Mr Bill Keller, executive editor of the New York Times, has written a letter to his own newspaper attacking a book review his own newspaper published. The objectionable essay was a review by legal scholar Richard Posner of several recent books on the media. Keller charges that Posner "weirdly" makes almost no distinction
within the vast category of American media, between those that are aggressively partisan and those that strive to keep opinion sequestered from news, between outlets that invest in serious reporting and those that simply riff on the reporting of others, between the sensational and the more high-minded, between organizations that hasten to correct errors and those that could not care less, between the cartoonish shout shows on cable TV and the more ambitious journalism of, say, the paper you are holding in your hands.
It's pretty obvious which side Mr Keller thinks the New York Times is on. Unfortunately, there's this and this and this and this and . . . well, you get the idea.
What's really weird is the juxtaposition of Mr Keller's vehement criticism and the New York Times book review editor's introduction to Mr Posner's essay:
In an essay on the credibility of the news media, Bad News, Posner weaves his way through the arguments of left and right with his predictable unpredictability, providing a surprisingly nonpolitical perspective on a very political subject.
Based on Mr Keller's intemperate and self-righteous letter, I'd guess that Mr Posner's essay is well worth reading—and ASAP before the Times removes from its website. Check it out.
Finally, I am peeved at Editor and Publisher for calling Richard Posner a conservative legal scholar. He's not a conservative: he's a libertarian. No wonder Bill Keller got his dander up.
via Drudge.









Posts
